header image

[Sign Up Now] to Receive Our FREE Daily SCVTV-SCVNews Digest by E-Mail

Inside
Weather


 
Calendar
Today in
S.C.V. History
March 28
1934 - Bouquet Canyon Reservoir, replacement for ill-fated St. Francis Dam & reservoir, begins to fill with water [story]
Bouquet Reservoir


newhallranch_statefishandgame

Newhall Ranch Project

[KHTS] – The California Supreme Court ruled on Monday to reject Newhall Land’s environmental impact report for the Newhall Ranch project, taking the project “back to the drawing board.”

The California Supreme Court found that the project did not have substantial evidence regarding greenhouse gas emissions; did not adequately protect the endangered unarmored threespine stickleback; and the plaintiffs, led by the Center for Biological Diversity, used up all of their resources by holding an optional comment period.

Justice Ming Chin, objected the ruling, saying the EIR could be “easily fixed” and the harm is in delay.

“The current EIR was finalized some five years ago,” said Chin. “By the time this litigation ends, and the new EIR is prepared and finalized, we will be much closer to 2020 than when the current EIR was finalized in 2010.”

Chin also said that delaying the project could offer rewards for opponents of the project.

“Delay the project long enough and it has to meet new targets, and then perhaps new targets after that,” said Chin. “All this is a recipe for paralysis.”

Justice Carol Corrigan agreed with a majority of the ruling, specifically the issues regarding the unarmored threespine stickleback and the methodology used to assess the significance of greenhouse gas emissions.

deh_stickleback3

Unarmored threespine stickleback

However, Corrigan did not believe that the Newhall Ranch project should have to provide comprehensive information regarding the greenhouse gas emissions.

“Because the level of detail the majority demands from this EIR is contrary to both our deferential standard of review and our approval of the methodology used to assess greenhouse gas significance, I respectfully dissent from that portion of its opinion,” said Corrigan.

Newhall Ranch is a 19-square-mile project proposed by Newhall Land and would include approximately 20,000 homes west of Interstate 5.

The completed project would bring about 60,000 new residents to the site, according to the Center for Biological Diversity.

 

Statement from Center for Biological Diversity et al.

SAN FRANCISCO— The California Supreme Court today struck a severe blow to the Newhall Ranch mega-development project near Los Angeles, upholding environmental claims brought against state wildlife officials by the Center for Biological Diversity, Wishtoyo Foundation/Ventura Coastkeeper, Friends of the Santa Clara River, SCOPE and the California Native Plant Society, and fully reversing a 2014 ruling by the Second Appellate District, Division Five.

“This is a tremendous victory for the climate and California’s protected wildlife,” said John Buse, senior counsel and legal director at the Center. “This decision means public officials have to show their work in determining whether massive new development projects will interfere with the state’s climate goals. The court also gave one of California’s rarest fish, and all other fully protected wildlife, a reprieve from eviction in the face of ever-encroaching sprawl.”

Newhall Ranch would create a new town of more than 60,000 residents on a 12,000-acre site in northern Los Angeles County that includes a nearly six-mile stretch of the Santa Clara River. The Santa Clara is the last major free-flowing river in Southern California, and is home to many rare species, including the unarmored threespine stickleback and southern steelhead. The development also would create new greenhouse gas emissions, equivalent to roughly 260,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide each year.

The state Supreme Court’s decision today resolves a 2011 suit challenging the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s approvals of permits for the entire development and review under the California Environmental Quality Act. The court’s decision addresses three distinct issues.

First, the court concluded it was reasonable for Fish and Wildlife to evaluate the project’s greenhouse gas emissions in light of statewide climate goals. But the court also held that the department’s conclusion — that the project’s emissions were insignificant because they reduced “business as usual” emissions by roughly the amount identified as necessary in the “scoping plan” for A.B. 32, California’s landmark greenhouse gas reduction law — was not adequately supported by the evidence. The court noted that the scoping plan’s statewide goals could not simply be applied to individual new projects like Newhall Ranch, particularly because it may be far easier to reduce emissions from new developments than from existing buildings.

“The Supreme Court got the big picture on climate and sprawl development exactly right,” said Center senior attorney Kevin Bundy. “To make good decisions, we need to know exactly how individual projects fit into California’s overall climate effort. Just taking a statewide analysis out of context and applying it to individual projects doesn’t produce useful results and doesn’t protect our climate.”

On the second issue, the court also agreed with environmental challengers that Fish and Wildlife improperly allowed the capture and relocation of unarmored threespine stickleback, a fish classified as “fully protected” under state law, to facilitate the development.

“Thanks to the court’s ruling, California’s fully protected wildlife species are truly fully protected,” said Buse. “The highest level of protection is required, not just for the unarmored threespine stickleback, but for California condors, peregrine falcons and sea otters. Fully protected wildlife species can no longer be evicted from their native habitat to accommodate new subdivisions.”

Finally, on the third issue, the court rejected the department’s attempt to discount comments raised by the public, including the Wishtoyo Foundation and Chumash Ceremonial Elder Mati Waiya, regarding the project’s effects on Native American cultural resources and steelhead.

“We applaud the California Supreme Court for maintaining the right of California tribes to identify and prevent impacts to tribal cultural resources in CEQA’s environmental review process,” said Mati Waiya, Wishtoyo executive director.

“This is a very good day for our current and future generations,” said Jason Weiner, general counsel for Wishtoyo and its Ventura Coastkeeper Program. “The court fulfilled its role by upholding California’s statutes needed to curb global warming, prevent species extinction, and to allow for meaningful public and tribal participation during state environmental review processes.”

The other environmental challengers also praised the decision:

“Friends of the Santa Clara River thanks the California Supreme Court for agreeing to consider this important case, and appreciates the effort that each member of the court put forth in making its decision,” said Ron Bottorff, Friends’ chair. “We see this decision as affirming that the California Environmental Quality Act has once again served to provide the proper framework for deciding critical issues in protecting our environment.”

Lynne Plambeck, president of the Santa Clarita Organization for Planning the Environment, said that today’s decision creates an opportunity to reconsider unsustainable mega-projects. “In a time of severe drought throughout California due to climate change, it is appropriate that the court will now require a closer look at how we can address this problem through the land use approval process. Californians have answered the call to help by making huge changes in their lives. The development industry must now look for solutions too.”

“The California Native Plant Society greatly appreciates the wisdom and thoughtfulness the California Supreme Court justices used in deciding the complex issues of this case,” said David Magney of the California Native Plant Society. “The court has saved CEQA as we know it and protected our environment.”

The plaintiffs were represented by John Buse, Aruna Prabhala and Kevin Bundy of the Center for Biological Diversity; Adam Keats; Jason Weiner of the Wishtoyo Foundation and Ventura Coastkeeper; Jan Chatten-Brown and Doug Carstens of the firm of Chatten-Brown and Carstens; and Sean Hecht of the Frank G. Wells Environmental Law Clinic at the University of California, Los Angeles.

The Center for Biological Diversity is a national, nonprofit conservation organization with more than 900,000 members and online activists dedicated to the protection of endangered species and wild places.

Wishtoyo is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit grassroots organization with over 700 members consisting of Ventura County’s diverse residents and Chumash Native Americans. Wishtoyo’s mission is to preserve and protect Chumash culture, the culture of all of Ventura County’s diverse communities, and the environment that our current and future generations depend upon.

Comment On This Story
COMMENT POLICY: We welcome comments from individuals and businesses. All comments are moderated. Comments are subject to rejection if they are vulgar, combative, or in poor taste.
REAL NAMES ONLY: All posters must use their real individual or business name. This applies equally to Twitter account holders who use a nickname.

22 Comments

  1. Anonymous says:

    Yay!

  2. Hooray! Got to love that three spine stickleback!

  3. Judith Pinto Judith Pinto says:

    I think the project needs to be trashed and never mind the stickleback. No use to us. Good excuse though/

  4. You know this will get through in the future, just cost more, run up the coast of building & raised
    The taxes.

  5. The water issues need to be taken care of before anymore building goes on. Throughout California!

  6. Jane Sifers Jane Sifers says:

    The stickleback is a hero fish.

  7. Thanks for the photo I was wondering what they looked like??

  8. 20,000 more cars on the 5 freeway, and no water. Another stupid rich corporate destructive decision, glad it got shelved.

  9. Dave Bogna Dave Bogna says:

    That fish looks like its the kind that swims up your pee whole and jacks you up.

  10. Jennifer – looks like this won’t be happening as soon as we thought. And I’m OK with that!

  11. PJ says:

    This is a poorly written article. It focuses on the dissenting opinions of 2 justices rather than the majority opinion, the basis and outcome of the case. The majority opinion reflects the reasoning behind the ruling. It’s much more important and interesting to SCV residents. Please provide more facts on the ruling. Thanks.

  12. Ron Licari Ron Licari says:

    Bout time some one stood up and said NO!!

  13. David Toth David Toth says:

    Any other past students from Sand Canyon Elementary remember walking out to the wash and netting the sticklebacks? They didn’t last long in the classroom fish tank.

  14. Lloyd Armour says:

    STOP THE BUILDING. Good News. Where does the SCV think the Water is coming from. All this building has already caused problems for Wildlife, Fish, etc. We have only a handful of Restaurants that’s half way decent. Too many fast food restaurants. We have several closed Restaurants that has never been re-opened, then the ones that move are horrible. IE: Red Robin, a big disappointment for that location. Very limited Senior building. Limited job opportunities for the cost of living. AV has more Restaurants than us. We’re suppose to be an up scale city, but building more homes isn’t the answer right now. Leave our open land alone for now.

  15. Marc says:

    Doesn’t the climate always change?

  16. Jennifer Kilpatrick says:

    This Supreme Court decision is wonderful news for the average person who works in the SFV, Downtown or Westside, but can’t afford to live there. Everyone knows someone like that, including me before I retired.

    This win has been a very long, arduous road for the Californians involved in trying to protect Santa Clarita Valley in so many ways. During that time period, Santa Clarita Valley has changed for the better in terms of voters engagement in issues which affect them. The idiotic plan to inject mega-millions of gallons per year of sewer plant brine under Stevenson Rancher’s homes was derailed because hundreds of people got involved and fought to preserve their homes value and their quality of life. If you want your SCV freeway traffic not to get worse, it will be important for Santa Claritans to be just as aggressively involved in opposing this project.

    One very important point to be made is that “Newhall Land” has not been a hometown-owned company for more than 10 years, as detailed in this earlier article from SCV News: http://www.hometownstation.com/santa-clarita-news/five-point-holdings-lennar-announce-request-to-take-newhall-land-public-156748

    That article ends by saying Newhall Land was reorganized in bankruptcy, but doesn’t say who bought the company at the end of the bankruptcy case, but we know who did because of Newhall Land’s filings with the California Public Utilities Commission. Under the bankruptcy plan the mortgage lender, Barclays Capital, in effect foreclosed on everything. Barclays then immediately re-sold part of the company to Lennar California (managed out of Orange County), another part to a man named Emile Haddad (also of Orange County), and the rest to 5 out-of-town hedge funds named by Haddad in a news article. Mr. Haddad has been running Newhall Land and a few other big projects, and told Big Builder Magazine that he could run all of the projects with just 21 key employees, all working in his Orange County office. The meaning of that comment was clear: Everyone you know who works in Santa Clarita was considered unimportant/expendable/fungible by the man running Newhall Land. Mr. Haddad meant that Greg, Marlee, Bill and everyone else you knew meant nothing to him. They had no juice with Mr. Haddad. They were expendable.

    Despite Mr. Haddad’s statement about their unimportance, Newhall Land’s local employees continued to run a scam on Santa Claritans by telling them that Newhall Land is a local company.

    Instead, after the Newhall Land bankruptcy the “traditional fear of offending Newhall Land” on the part of many in the Santa Clarita business community is just neurotic and silly, because no one you know from Newhall Land is important to the company’s real owners.

    The SCVNews story linked above tells you that Mr. Haddad and Lennar’s Miami-based management were planning to sell off Newhall Ranch and other property in California to a new entity, which would have a new stock offering which would need to be blessed by the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission. According to that SCVNews article, at the end of that “initial public offering” aka IPO, Lennar would own, at most, 35% of the new company.

    Very clearly, the locally owned and controlled Newhall Land of old is long gone and will be further attenuated from any concern for Santa Clarita when the sale of Newhall Ranch happens in that IPO.

    Newhall Land’s actual owners, present and future, do not care a bit about you residents of Santa Claritans. So you should rejoice that their Santa Clarita quality-of-life-destroying plan has been shut down, at least for now.

    Santa Clarita Valley voters need to understand that “What’s good for Lennar/Haddad/Hedge Funds is not good for Santa Claritans.” Santa Clarita voters need to hold their County, City and Water District elected officials’ feet to the fire and require that they ALWAYS vote for the best quality of life alternative for Santa Claritans, not for the interests of out-of-town securities investors who really don’t give a hoot about any Santa Claritans quality of life or well-being.

  17. Abby Shields looks like the “stickleback” fishy won this battle… The “fairy shrimp” can learn from them! Lol

  18. Randy Geniec Randy Geniec says:

    Tony Arnold. This is why California is going downhill.

Leave a Comment


SCV NewsBreak
LOCAL NEWS HEADLINES
Wednesday, Mar 27, 2024
California Launches New Youth Suicide Prevention Campaign
The California Department of Public Health launched the “Never a Bother” campaign, a youth suicide prevention public awareness and outreach campaign for youth, young adults, and their parents, caregivers, and allies.
Wednesday, Mar 27, 2024
April 20: Santa Clarita Master Chorale’s Cabaret, Cabernet Fundraiser
The Santa Clarita Master Chorale invites the community to "Let the Sunshine In," a delightful evening of food, wine and song at the annual Cabaret & Cabernet fundraising benefit.
Wednesday, Mar 27, 2024
Schiavo Introduces Bill to Prohibit ‘Derogatory’ School Mascot Names
California State Assemblywoman Pilar Schiavo (D-Chatsworth) and Assemblyman James Ramos (D-Highland) have introduced AB 3074 the "School or athletic team names: California Racial Mascots Act."
Keep Up With Our Facebook

Latest Additions to SCVNews.com
1934 - Bouquet Canyon Reservoir, replacement for ill-fated St. Francis Dam & reservoir, begins to fill with water [story]
Bouquet Reservoir
The California Department of Public Health launched the “Never a Bother” campaign, a youth suicide prevention public awareness and outreach campaign for youth, young adults, and their parents, caregivers, and allies.
California Launches New Youth Suicide Prevention Campaign
The Santa Clarita Master Chorale invites the community to "Let the Sunshine In," a delightful evening of food, wine and song at the annual Cabaret & Cabernet fundraising benefit.
April 20: Santa Clarita Master Chorale’s Cabaret, Cabernet Fundraiser
The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health cautions residents who are planning to visit the below Los Angeles County beaches to avoid swimming, surfing, and playing in ocean waters:
March 27 Ocean Water Warning
As an integral ingredient necessary to help the Santa Clarita Valley to flourish, feedback from the business community is the secret sauce for achieving great things.
SCVEDEC Asks For the Business Community’s Opinion on Santa Clarita
Raise your heart rate while raising funds for the Santa Clarita Sister Cities Dollars-for-Desks campaign to provide school desks for students in Sariaya, Santa Clarita's Sister City in the Philippines.
April 13: Sister Cities Zumba-thon Fundraiser
Remo, Inc. is is the world's leading manufacturer and developer of synthetic drumheads and shells. They’ve been in business for 60 years
SCVEDC Company Spotlight: Drumming Up Big Business with Remo, Inc.
California State Assemblywoman Pilar Schiavo (D-Chatsworth) and Assemblyman James Ramos (D-Highland) have introduced AB 3074 the "School or athletic team names: California Racial Mascots Act."
Schiavo Introduces Bill to Prohibit ‘Derogatory’ School Mascot Names
Los Angeles County’s Justice, Care and Opportunities Department  in collaboration with Local Initiatives Support Corporation Los Angeles is proud to announce the 2nd Annual Pitch Competition for the cohorts of JCOD's Incubation Academy.
March 28: JCOD Incubation Academy Helps Grassroots Non-Profits For the Second Year
Children’s Bureau is seeking foster families and now offers two virtual ways for individuals and/or couples to learn how to help children in foster care while reunifying with birth families or how to provide legal permanency by adoption.
April 18: Children’s Bureau Hosts Virtual Orientation
The Sunburst track was constructed in 1887 by the Southern Pacific Railroad and was a part of the main line running between San Francisco and Los Angeles.
Enjoy Spring With a Ride On The Sunburst Track
California State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond hosted a Personal Finance Summit today where he announced his support for Assembly Bill 2927 (McCarty), legislation that would require a personal finance education course for California high school graduation.
State Superintendent Announces Support for Personal Finance Graduation Requirement
1847 - Probable birth date of Pico Canyon oil driller Charles Alexander Mentry [story]
C.A. Mentry
The first Music Jam Session at The MAIN was held on Thursday, Feb. 22 and was a hit. Come out and join in for the next one on Thursday, March 28 7 p.m.-9 p.m.
March 28: The MAIN to Host Musicians’ Jam Session
Los Angeles County Inspector General Max Huntsman of the Office of Inspector General has issued a report entitled "Tenth Report Back on Implementing Body-Worn Cameras in Los Angeles County."
Office of Inspector General Issues Latest Report on LASD Body Cams
College of the Canyons women's tennis played to a convincing 7-2 conference win over Ventura College on Moica to strengthen its potential playoff resume.
Canyons Closes Out Ventura 7-2 in Final Home Match
Join the Santa Clarita Valley Chamber of Commerce with the Latino Business Alliance at the Cinco de Mayo Networking Celebration on Tuesday, May 7.
May 7: Latino Business Alliance Cinco de Mayo Celebration
The Los Angeles County Department of Animal Care and Control is hosting March Meowness promotion where all cat adoptions are just $15 from now until April 9.
Adopt a Cat During March Meowness at Castaic Animal Center
California State University, Northridge is partnering with the Fernandeño Tataviam Band of Mission Indians and the Tataviam Land Conservancy to battle the impact of climate change in disadvantaged communities throughout the San Fernando Valley by establishing “urban forests.”
CSUN Partners with Fernandeño Tataviam Band to Build Urban Forests
Join the Santa Clarita Artists Association on Monday, April 15, 6:30-8:30 p.m. at Barnes and Noble, 23630 Valencia Blvd., Valencia, CA 91355, for the SCAA monthly meeting and guest demonstrator.
April 15: SCAA Presents Debbie Abshear Watercolor Demo
Residents are invited to join members of the Santa Clarita City Council for a special ribbon-cutting ceremony to celebrate the addition of Santa Clarita's 38th park, Skyline Ranch Park, 18355 Skyline Ranch Road, Santa Clarita, CA 91351, to the Santa Clarita parks system on Saturday, April 6, at 10 a.m.
April 6: Grand Opening for Santa Clarita’s 38th Park
The Santa Clarita Valley Senior Center is preparing for the annual fundraising event, Celebrity Waiter, with the theme “California Dreamin’” on Saturday, April 27 at Bella Vida, 27180 Golden Valley Road, Santa Clarita, CA 91351.
Table Sponsorships Still Available for Celebrity Waiter Dinner
Springtime in Santa Clarita brings not only vibrant blooms and opportunities to embrace the outdoors with warmer weather, but also an array of free, family-friendly events and this Saturday is no exception.
Ken Striplin | A Fun, Festive, Egg-Filled Day
SCVNews.com