header image

[Sign Up Now] to Receive Our FREE Daily SCVTV-SCVNews Digest by E-Mail

Inside
Weather


 
Calendar
Today in
S.C.V. History
March 28
1934 - Bouquet Canyon Reservoir, replacement for ill-fated St. Francis Dam & reservoir, begins to fill with water [story]
Bouquet Reservoir


The U.S. Supreme Court reported Monday that it will not hear the case involving a former Santa Clarita child with Native American ancestry who was removed from a foster home in Saugus and placed with relatives in Utah.

The decision puts an end to the legal tug-of-war over 6-year-old “Lexi,” which gained media attention last March when her foster parents, Rusty and Summer Page, went public in their opposition to the child’s impending placement with with her relatives, a move that had been planned in 2011 before Lexi came into the Pages’ care.

Two lower courts and the California Supreme Court denied appeals last year to keep Lexi with her foster family.

According to court documents filed with the U.S. Supreme Court by Lexi’s own court-appointed attorney, Christopher Blake, “The minor is satisfied with her current adoptive placement; it is in accord with general principles of California law and with the principles of (the Indian Child Welfare Act), both federal and California. There is simply no need for this court to intervene and upset this adoptive placement to which the minor, her tribe, the agency responsible for her care and custody and her parents, have all agreed.”

Blake also states that both the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services and the Choctaw Tribe of Oklahoma, in which is Lexi is eligible for enrollment, have chosen Lexi’s relatives in Utah, “and that selection was made before (the Pages) ever assumed any care for the minor, and they were always aware of that fact,” adding that state law “strongly favors relative placement and placement with siblings for dependent minors.”

In a statement released Monday on the “Save Lexi” Facebook page, the Page family wrote: “To say we are heartbroken is an understatement. … We will continue to advocate on Lexi’s behalf. We are her parents and will never give up on her. Our home will always be her home, and we know that one day we will be able to hold her in our arms again. One day she will know how many people fought for her. Lexi, we love you forever and ever.”

“The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear the appeal in Lexi’s case. This means the former foster parents have exhausted their appeals, and Lexi can now remain permanently with her sister in the home of their extended family,” said DCFS Public Affairs Director Armand Montiel. “We are satisfied with the Supreme Court’s decision.”

An article by Charlie D. Clark of the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, published Jan. 11 in Native Times, states: “The Choctaw Nation is pleased that this lengthy and unnecessary litigation has been brought to an end by the U.S. Supreme Court. Lexi can remain where she belongs, with extended family that will raise her and a sister in the Choctaw tradition. The attorneys who brought the case to the high court made clear from the beginning their goal was not only to remove Lexi from her Utah family, but to overturn the Indian Child Welfare Act. They failed to do so, and the ICWA will continue to protect Native American children’s rights to family and cultural connections.”

Statements from other parties involved in the case will be added to this article as they become available.

Attached are briefs submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court by all parties:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comment On This Story
COMMENT POLICY: We welcome comments from individuals and businesses. All comments are moderated. Comments are subject to rejection if they are vulgar, combative, or in poor taste.
REAL NAMES ONLY: All posters must use their real individual or business name. This applies equally to Twitter account holders who use a nickname.

7 Comments

  1. Star says:

    Lexi, is exactly where she needs to be, where she legally belongs. The interests of this child were met. Lexi is free to blossom without the unnecessary petty vindictiveness of that foster family who used her as a prop to win sympathy from the duped masses of ignorant people living in SCV.

  2. goooey says:

    http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/B252999.PDF

    “By the time Alexandria was placed with the P.s in December 2011, her extended family in Utah, the R.s, were aware of dependency proceeding and had spoken to representatives of the tribe about their interest in adopting Alexandria. The tribe agreed to initial foster placement with the P.s because it was close to father at a time when he was working on reunification. If reunification services were terminated, the tribe recommended placement with the R.s in Utah.”

    The Utah Family referred to as the R’s were always the first choice for placement if reunification with the biological father failed.

    “On October 4, 2012, the court terminated father’s reunification services and scheduled a hearing for termination of parental rights under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. At the Department’s request on November 16, 2012, the court issued a request for expedited placement, identifying the R.s in Utah as the planned placement under the ICPC.”

    As early as November 16, 2012 a request for expedited placement was issued.

    “On January 17, 2013, while the ICPC request was still in process, Alexandria’s guardian ad litem and court-appointed attorney requested a “Do Not Remove” order to prevent Alexandria from being moved out of state without a court order. ”

    By January 2013, the Page’s blocked the placement of Lexi with the intended adoptive family in Utah. During the 2yrs that lexi was under foster care with the Pages, the Pages was reminded that the child was under ICWA jurisdiction, that the foster placement was _temporary_, that the R’s were the intended adoptive placement family.

    The Page’s most likely acted out of a misguided attempt at safeguarding Lexi’s welfare. but the irony is that they probably ended up causing the most damage by delaying Lexi’s prompt placement for _3 years_

  3. Coastal Sage says:

    Here’s a link to the resume of the appellate lawyer for the foster parents who appealed the California courts’ decisions all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. Now no one in Santa Clarita will ever find out why she took the case. http://wilkinsonwalsh.com/who-we-are/lori-alvino-mcgill/

    Now we’ll never find out what the Goldwater Institute wanted to accomplish by filing an amicus brief in the case in support of the foster parents.

    The U.S. Supreme Court’s docket page for this case tells us that on January 6, 2017 the Justices sat down and discussed a bunch of cases to decide which ones they wanted to hear. It’s pretty bone chilling from the point of view of the foster parents and the little girl involved to think of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices sitting around a table and deciding, in effect “Off with their heads”.

    With my kids, looking back at ancestors who would make up a 1/64th blood line we would have to go all the way back before the Revolutionary War. I bet the same holds true for most families in the USA.

    The upshot of the refusal of the U.S. Supreme Court to hear this case is that if your children are 1/64th Native American, or more, you need to keep your mouth shut about that fact, because if those children are ever involved in a custody lawsuit some Native American tribe can muscle their way in, claim that your child is a Native American and a defacto member of their tribe and dictate who gets custody, regardless of what the judge thinks is right. No I am not kidding.

    • Lina says:

      @Coastal Sage: “Here’s a link to the resume of the appellate lawyer for the foster parents who appealed the California courts’ decisions all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. Now no one in Santa Clarita will ever find out why she took the case.”

      She took it because she is a part of a group that wants to abolish a federal law. Also because no respectable attorney would take such a case, and she was the only one desperate enough for it.

      “Now we’ll never find out what the Goldwater Institute wanted to accomplish by filing an amicus brief in the case in support of the foster parents.”

      The Goldwater Institute wants to destroy it’s founder’s reputation, and so they want to abolish the federal law that the founder was in favour of.
      Also, there is money involved in finalizing adoptions, so people with a financial interest in that will try to create more opportunities to make money whenever they can.

      “The U.S. Supreme Court’s docket page for this case tells us that on January 6, 2017 the Justices sat down and discussed a bunch of cases to decide which ones they wanted to hear. It’s pretty bone chilling from the point of view of the foster parents and the little girl involved to think of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices sitting around a table and deciding, in effect “Off with their heads”.”

      Why are you including the girl in that? She wants to stay in Utah, with her baby sister and her family. She does not want her former fosters.
      And the former fosters have done absolutely nothing to earn sympathy points. They made their bed when they prevented Lexi from going home almost four years ago now. They knew it would come to this moment and they did not care how their actions would affect Lexi.
      THAT is bone chilling.

      “With my kids, looking back at ancestors who would make up a 1/64th blood line we would have to go all the way back before the Revolutionary War. I bet the same holds true for most families in the USA.”

      Then rest assured that it has nothing to do with that. That ancestor is simply the enrolled ancestor who guaranteed his children enrollement, his children guaranteed their children enrollement, etc.
      Lexi’s father is an enrolled member of the Choctaw Nation. So was her grandmother. So are both of her sisters. Lexi’s membership in the tribe is because her father is a member.
      And just because they got their eligibility through that one ancestor does not mean it’s the only Native ancestor of that family just because it’s his line on their CDIB.

      “The upshot of the refusal of the U.S. Supreme Court to hear this case is that if your children are 1/64th Native American, or more, you need to keep your mouth shut about that fact, because if those children are ever involved in a custody lawsuit some Native American tribe can muscle their way in, claim that your child is a Native American and a defacto member of their tribe and dictate who gets custody, regardless of what the judge thinks is right. No I am not kidding.”

      You may not be kidding, but you are absolutely mistaken.
      Lexi is an enrolled member of the Choctaw Nation, and her father requested a placement with family members, the tribe simply approved his request.
      Also, if your children are 1/64 Native American, that does not mean they are eligible for enrollment in federally recognized tribe. ICWA only applies to children who are members of a federally reconized tribe or eligible for enrollment in such. And even then, they do not ignore the parents’ wishes.
      There’s actually one case where both parents of an Indian child wanted their child to be adopted to strangers. The tribe did not fight that, since both parents wanted it, and simply made the condition that the girl be enrolled in the tribe before the adoption, which was the girl’s right.

      Also, all judges involved in this case have ruled in favour of Lexi’s family and against the former fosters. Lexi’s move to her family was right for her, and all professionals and her family members approved it. The only ones who didn’t like it are the former fosters, and they never had any rights to the child AND the child does not want to be with them anyway.

      • SCVNews.com says:

        Also, if you remove ancestry from the equation altogether, what you’re left with is some non-relatives trying to prevent a child from reuniting with her competent relatives, which they knew would happen from the very beginning, and dragging it out in court for years, to the potential detriment of the child’s emotional well being.

  4. Nadiya Littlewarrior says:

    Thank you SCOTUS!

  5. Jo says:

    It is amazing that here in the article are all of the documents given the court. I can’t believe that anyone who actually reads through them would come to the conclusion that the child’s best interest was not served.

Leave a Comment


SCV NewsBreak
LOCAL NEWS HEADLINES
Wednesday, Mar 27, 2024
California Launches New Youth Suicide Prevention Campaign
The California Department of Public Health launched the “Never a Bother” campaign, a youth suicide prevention public awareness and outreach campaign for youth, young adults, and their parents, caregivers, and allies.
Wednesday, Mar 27, 2024
April 20: Santa Clarita Master Chorale’s Cabaret, Cabernet Fundraiser
The Santa Clarita Master Chorale invites the community to "Let the Sunshine In," a delightful evening of food, wine and song at the annual Cabaret & Cabernet fundraising benefit.
Wednesday, Mar 27, 2024
Schiavo Introduces Bill to Prohibit ‘Derogatory’ School Mascot Names
California State Assemblywoman Pilar Schiavo (D-Chatsworth) and Assemblyman James Ramos (D-Highland) have introduced AB 3074 the "School or athletic team names: California Racial Mascots Act."
Keep Up With Our Facebook

Latest Additions to SCVNews.com
1934 - Bouquet Canyon Reservoir, replacement for ill-fated St. Francis Dam & reservoir, begins to fill with water [story]
Bouquet Reservoir
The California Department of Public Health launched the “Never a Bother” campaign, a youth suicide prevention public awareness and outreach campaign for youth, young adults, and their parents, caregivers, and allies.
California Launches New Youth Suicide Prevention Campaign
The Santa Clarita Master Chorale invites the community to "Let the Sunshine In," a delightful evening of food, wine and song at the annual Cabaret & Cabernet fundraising benefit.
April 20: Santa Clarita Master Chorale’s Cabaret, Cabernet Fundraiser
The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health cautions residents who are planning to visit the below Los Angeles County beaches to avoid swimming, surfing, and playing in ocean waters:
March 27 Ocean Water Warning
As an integral ingredient necessary to help the Santa Clarita Valley to flourish, feedback from the business community is the secret sauce for achieving great things.
SCVEDEC Asks For the Business Community’s Opinion on Santa Clarita
Raise your heart rate while raising funds for the Santa Clarita Sister Cities Dollars-for-Desks campaign to provide school desks for students in Sariaya, Santa Clarita's Sister City in the Philippines.
April 13: Sister Cities Zumba-thon Fundraiser
Remo, Inc. is is the world's leading manufacturer and developer of synthetic drumheads and shells. They’ve been in business for 60 years
SCVEDC Company Spotlight: Drumming Up Big Business with Remo, Inc.
California State Assemblywoman Pilar Schiavo (D-Chatsworth) and Assemblyman James Ramos (D-Highland) have introduced AB 3074 the "School or athletic team names: California Racial Mascots Act."
Schiavo Introduces Bill to Prohibit ‘Derogatory’ School Mascot Names
Los Angeles County’s Justice, Care and Opportunities Department  in collaboration with Local Initiatives Support Corporation Los Angeles is proud to announce the 2nd Annual Pitch Competition for the cohorts of JCOD's Incubation Academy.
March 28: JCOD Incubation Academy Helps Grassroots Non-Profits For the Second Year
Children’s Bureau is seeking foster families and now offers two virtual ways for individuals and/or couples to learn how to help children in foster care while reunifying with birth families or how to provide legal permanency by adoption.
April 18: Children’s Bureau Hosts Virtual Orientation
The Sunburst track was constructed in 1887 by the Southern Pacific Railroad and was a part of the main line running between San Francisco and Los Angeles.
Enjoy Spring With a Ride On The Sunburst Track
California State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond hosted a Personal Finance Summit today where he announced his support for Assembly Bill 2927 (McCarty), legislation that would require a personal finance education course for California high school graduation.
State Superintendent Announces Support for Personal Finance Graduation Requirement
1847 - Probable birth date of Pico Canyon oil driller Charles Alexander Mentry [story]
C.A. Mentry
The first Music Jam Session at The MAIN was held on Thursday, Feb. 22 and was a hit. Come out and join in for the next one on Thursday, March 28 7 p.m.-9 p.m.
March 28: The MAIN to Host Musicians’ Jam Session
Los Angeles County Inspector General Max Huntsman of the Office of Inspector General has issued a report entitled "Tenth Report Back on Implementing Body-Worn Cameras in Los Angeles County."
Office of Inspector General Issues Latest Report on LASD Body Cams
College of the Canyons women's tennis played to a convincing 7-2 conference win over Ventura College on Moica to strengthen its potential playoff resume.
Canyons Closes Out Ventura 7-2 in Final Home Match
Join the Santa Clarita Valley Chamber of Commerce with the Latino Business Alliance at the Cinco de Mayo Networking Celebration on Tuesday, May 7.
May 7: Latino Business Alliance Cinco de Mayo Celebration
The Los Angeles County Department of Animal Care and Control is hosting March Meowness promotion where all cat adoptions are just $15 from now until April 9.
Adopt a Cat During March Meowness at Castaic Animal Center
California State University, Northridge is partnering with the Fernandeño Tataviam Band of Mission Indians and the Tataviam Land Conservancy to battle the impact of climate change in disadvantaged communities throughout the San Fernando Valley by establishing “urban forests.”
CSUN Partners with Fernandeño Tataviam Band to Build Urban Forests
Join the Santa Clarita Artists Association on Monday, April 15, 6:30-8:30 p.m. at Barnes and Noble, 23630 Valencia Blvd., Valencia, CA 91355, for the SCAA monthly meeting and guest demonstrator.
April 15: SCAA Presents Debbie Abshear Watercolor Demo
Residents are invited to join members of the Santa Clarita City Council for a special ribbon-cutting ceremony to celebrate the addition of Santa Clarita's 38th park, Skyline Ranch Park, 18355 Skyline Ranch Road, Santa Clarita, CA 91351, to the Santa Clarita parks system on Saturday, April 6, at 10 a.m.
April 6: Grand Opening for Santa Clarita’s 38th Park
The Santa Clarita Valley Senior Center is preparing for the annual fundraising event, Celebrity Waiter, with the theme “California Dreamin’” on Saturday, April 27 at Bella Vida, 27180 Golden Valley Road, Santa Clarita, CA 91351.
Table Sponsorships Still Available for Celebrity Waiter Dinner
Springtime in Santa Clarita brings not only vibrant blooms and opportunities to embrace the outdoors with warmer weather, but also an array of free, family-friendly events and this Saturday is no exception.
Ken Striplin | A Fun, Festive, Egg-Filled Day
SCVNews.com