header image

[Sign Up Now] to Receive Our FREE Daily SCVTV-SCVNews Digest by E-Mail

Inside
Weather


 
Calendar
Today in
S.C.V. History
March 29
1928 - Little dam victim, thought unidentified & buried in SCV, actually ID'd & buried in Chatsworth [story]
Newhall Cowboys


SCV Water has filed a lawsuit against the Whittaker Corporation, seeking remediation and cost recovery for the removal of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and further remediation of perchlorate contamination from the Santa Clarita Valley ground water basin. The suit was filed in the United States District Court, Central District of California.

The Whittaker Site, 996 acres in the center of Santa Clarita, was used for munitions manufacturing up until 1987. The site itself was found to be contaminated with very high levels of ammonium perchlorate, as well as VOCs perchloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE). The site continues to be subject to a cleanup order under the supervision of the State Department of Toxic Substances Control.

This isn’t the first time water providers have had to resort to litigation to compel Whittaker to clean up the damages its operations have caused in the community’s groundwater basin. In 2000, the predecessors to SCV Water filed suit to seek reimbursement of response costs, replacement water purchase costs, ongoing wellhead treatment, and well replacement. In 2003, Federal Court Judge, the Honorable Howard Matz, issued a published opinion finding that Whittaker and others were liable under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Recovery Act (“CERCLA”) for perchlorate contamination found in SCV water supply wells.

In 2007, Whittaker entered into a settlement agreement for the remediation or replacement of five production wells. Currently SCV Water operates two well treatment facilities (covering three impacted wells) which use a special resin designed to remove perchlorate molecules from the water.

Since that time, additional wells not included in the original settlement have been impacted by or threatened with perchlorate contamination, and VOC’s have been detected at a number of wells. Additional treatment facilities and operations will be needed to address these.

“The mandates issued to Whittaker in previous settlements do not adequately address the continuing spread of perchlorate contamination, and do not require Whittaker to address VOCs at all,” said Matt Stone, general manager of SCV Water. “It is Whittaker’s responsibility to reimburse the water providers and our community for the cost of replacement water, remediation, and additional groundwater treatment.”

Informal discussions with the Whittaker Corporation have not brought resolution, so the complaint was filed.

“We regularly collect and test water samples from every well in our system,” said Jim Leserman, senior engineer with SCV Water. “Our efforts confirm that the drinking water being served in the SCV is safe, and meets all state and federal drinking water health standards, and it’s important that Whittaker continues to fund the ongoing efforts.”

“Whittaker should step up and cover the cost of this remediation,” added Stone. “Unfortunately, history suggests they will continue to stall in hopes of postponing or avoiding their responsibilities. Despite the recent news accounts and public relations charm campaign to depict the Whittaker site cleanup as ‘nearly complete’, the legacy of their historic contamination of the community’s groundwater basin remains to be fully addressed.”

Information on the status of the Whittaker Bermite contamination and clean-up can be found at the City of Santa Clarita’s informational page www.whittakerbermite.com.

Comment On This Story
COMMENT POLICY: We welcome comments from individuals and businesses. All comments are moderated. Comments are subject to rejection if they are vulgar, combative, or in poor taste.
REAL NAMES ONLY: All posters must use their real individual or business name. This applies equally to Twitter account holders who use a nickname.

6 Comments

  1. travis levy says:

    I love it . Here the government back in the late 30’s and 40’s needed Bermite for WW2 and Vietnam. but now decades later that want to sue them and their not even around anymore. No one back then knew of the containments nor did they know SCV would get this ridiculously big. Good luck on the law suit but I doubt you’ll win

  2. waterwatcher says:

    Someone sure got this headline wrong. Geez! Did you not read the press release? The lawsuit is over volatile organizc compounds. They sued over perchorate in 2003 and settled in 2007 when Whittiker agreed to pay for most of the clean up. They did not agree at that time to pay for the clean up of Volatile organic compounds, which cause cancer even in small amounts.

    Can’t understand why Travis thinks the government shouldn’t pay for the clean up of a pollutant that could cause cancer. They just dumped all these chemicals instead of properly disposing of them. As engineers and chemists, they should have known better. Clean up is very expensive. It would be difficult for the community to pay for it without the responsible parties paying.

  3. waterwatcher says:

    Someone sure got this headline wrong. Geez! Did you not read the press release? The lawsuit is over volatile organic compounds. They sued over perchlorate in 2000 and settled in 2007 when Whittiker agreed to pay for most of the clean up. The press release is pretty bizarre too. First it says they have never had to sue, then in the following sentence it says they sued in 2000. Guess they need a proof reader. They did not agree at that time to pay for the clean up of Volatile organic compounds, which cause cancer even in small amounts.

    Can’t understand why Travis thinks the government shouldn’t pay for the clean up of a pollutant that could cause cancer. They just dumped all these chemicals instead of properly disposing of them. As engineers and chemists, they should have known better. Clean up is very expensive. It would be difficult for the community to pay for it without the responsible parties paying.

  4. Jennifer Kilpatrick says:

    I lived in the Santa Clarita Valley in 1998-2003 when Castaic Lake Water Agency and the 3 retail water agencies were talking about bearing the cost of clean-up (remediation) of the ground water in a certain part of Santa Clarita. The concern everyone had was that perchlorate would contaminate most of Santa Clarita’s well water supply.

    At that time two of my friends, Joan Dunn and Lynne Plambeck, both publicly elected Directors of Newhall County Water District phoned me at work. They were both profoundly upset because without any notice to them or to any other elected water agency directors, the lawyer for all 4 water agencies (a partner in a law firm I’ll call NLLP) had secretly signed an agreement with Whittaker and approved by a clueless-about-Santa Clarita judge. The agreement said that none of the Directors of the 4 water agencies (including Joan and Lynne) could take any steps on the list below to educate themselves about what was going on in the lawsuit unless each Director signed a confidentiality agreement for the benefit of Castaic Lake Water Agency andWhittaker, promising they would not talk about what they had seen in the expert reports or court documents with anyone other than the lawyer and that they could not have copies of any of the documents. In the confidentiality agreement, it said that if any Director broke the promises in the Agreement, s/he would be the subject of a potentially huge money judgment payable by the publicly elected Director from his or her own assets, not water agency assets.

    In my 40 years as a lawyer I had never seen elected officials being asked to sign such a broad confidentiality agreement, let alone one which threatened and frightened the elected official. As I read through the confidentiality agreement which NLLP, Whittaker and the judge signed, all I could think about were the old days in the 1970’s when the mafia controlled the operations of many cities in New York State.

    Among the documents which the confidentiality agreement said the publicly elected directors of the 4 water agencies were not supposed to talk about, copy, or disclose to voters and taxpayers were:

    1. Written reports of the expert witnesses for each side of the case.
    2. Written communications between the expert witnesses, the lawyers or the court.
    3. Any tangible evidence which the experts physically looked at, like soil or water samples.
    4. Any deposition transcripts of the expert witnesses.
    5. Any videotapes of depositions of the expert witnesses.
    6. Any of the expert witnesses notes on the water contamination or the lawsuit.
    7. Written reports and letters written by any employees or officers of the 4 water agencies.
    8. Written communications between the water agency employees or officers, the lawyers or the court.
    9. Any tangible evidence which the 4 water agencies employees or officers physically looked at, like soil or water samples.
    10. Any deposition transcripts of the 4 water agencies employees or officers.
    11. Any videotapes of depositions of the 4 water agencies employees or officers.
    12. Any of the 4 water agencies employees or officers’ notes on the water contamination or the lawsuit.

    I could go on with even more of the list but you get the point. It seemed that Whittaker’s lawyers and the 4 water agencies’ lawyers at NLLP wanted to keep the publicly elected directors of Castaic Lake Water Agency or Newhall County Water District completely in the dark about their water agencies multi-million dollar problem. Even more important the Confidentiality Agreement’s purpose was to keep people who drank, cooked and bathed with the well water completely in the dark about what NLLP was alleging in his court filings and communications with Whittaker.

    It was crystal clear that the lawyer from NLLP and the Executive Director of Castaic Lake Water Agency wanted to keep the 4 water agencies Directors completely in the dark and tightly control and filter the information about the lawsuit and the science so that all a publicly elected Director would hear the “party line” from NLLP., nothing more.

    That level of secrecy and manipulation of publicly elected officials of 2 water agencies forced the elected officials to breach their duty of loyalty to the voters, taxpayers and water consumers. Sadly, only Joan and Lynne were smart enough to figure out what was going on.

    That level of manipulation and secrecy on the part of the lawyer hired by the 4 water agencies was particularly appalling in the context of the California Department of Toxic Substances Control being in possession of expert reports which showed that the ground/well water contamination had gone under the Metrolink station and its parking lot at the “Swap Meet”, that the underground contaminated water had gone under some Circle J homes, the commercial buildings around and across the street from the old K-Mart, and westward under the street along the river all the way past City Hall.

    VOC’s are particularly nasty carcinogens. They lurk in near surface ground water and then join gases which percolate upwards towards the earth’s surface and into the walls of buildings. Soon after Lynne and Joan found out about the confidentiality agreement which bound them even though they had not signed it, the California Department of Toxics Substances Control opened a new “case” about redevelopment of the swap meet with houses and apartments. The DTSC’s letter to the owner of the swap meet said that they understood the swap meet owner was not the party who contaminated taground water, but because of the risk of the VOC vapors coming out of the ground and into the walls of wooden structures, DTSC would not clear the property for wood frame apartment and town house development unless a deed restriction was recorded which absolutely forbid the new housing from having any “places for human habitation on the first floor.” Garages on the first floors of housing built above the VOC contaminated soil would be OK, but bedrooms or family rooms on the first floor would not be acceptable. The owners of the swap meet property apparently got very upset about the DTSC’s communications. About a year after that file was opened by DTSC it was closed.

    Once I had the complete picture of what was going on I telephoned one of Whittaker’s senior lawyers and tried to talk to him about releasing Joan and Lynne from the confidentiality agreement. He sounded very irritated and said to me “Don’t you understand that it is the 4 water agencies’ lawyer who wanted the gag-order on the publicly elected directors of the water agencies, not him. Lynne and Joan decided to take the most conservative approach since truly evil manipulations were going on at the water agencies. They chose NOT to sign the acknowledgments of the confidentiality agreements’ terms which NLLP had provided to Joan, As a result, the 4 water agencies went blithely onward, with their decision makers designated by California law not being allowed to see any of the evidence in the case first hand, but instead to rely on their agencies’ lawyers from NLLP.

    A few years later Castaic Lake Water Agency’s executives announced with great fanfare that they had settled the lawsuit with Whittaker. Of course the Settlement Agreement’s text and its important terms were “secret documents” which the public was not going to allow to be seen ever. Through a whole lot of intense internet searches by at least 4 Santa Claritans, the final version of the Settlement Agreement popped up. None of its exhibits were attached. All of us read it. What was particularly interesting to me was that Whittaker’s insurance companies were going to pay out “full policy limits”, with no meaningful amount of cash coming out of Whittaker’s pocket to add to the settlement. As a result the settlement only covered contamination of Santa Clarita’s ground/well water with the chemical called perchlorate, which is causes thyroid problems and developmental delays in children whose moms drank the perchlorate laden water. The settlement money was only supposed to be used to clean-up (remediate) the perchlorate from the community’s ground/well water and not address VOC contamination. In that Settlement Agreement Whittaker and the 4 water agencies addressing the ground/well water contamination with VOCs spreading throughout the community would be left for another day. (Based on my recollection of when that Settlement Agreement was signed, I think the 4 local water agencies (now merged into one public water agency) have been waiting about 10 years from the perchlorate settlement date to file this new lawsuit.

    The Settlement Agreement also required that any further litigation between Whittaker and the 4 water agencies was to occur under a special procedure created by the California Legislature called a “reference proceeding”. Typically a reference proceeding follows California court rules and the presiding judicial decision maker is a retired judge who all of the parties to the case agree-on. Typically a reference proceeding is held in private law firm office suites. The public is not told when the reference proceeding sessions occur. Even if a member of the public knows about a hearing before the retired judge in the reference proceeding, the parties do not need to agree to let the public or press in to watch and listen to the evidence in the “reference proceeding”.

    It will be interesting to see if NLLP has already been through the reference proceeding and efforts to settle the VOC related claims have failed, or if NLLP and its Santa Clarita Water Agency client are just now embarking on a reference proceeding which they are conveniently calling a lawsuit. In the meantime it sure would be sportsman-like for the new water agency to disclose to the public where in Santa Clarita the near surface well/ground water is contaminated with VOCs (which are carcinogenic) and where the active plumes of VOC laden underground water are moving.

    • SCVNews.com says:

      It sounds like we need a “document dump” to add to SCVHistory.com. We (media) could have argued a Public Records Act request case in court, but we’d have had to know what documents to request.

  5. waterwatcher says:

    Glad to see that someone changed the title from whittaker-corporation-sued-by-scv-water-over- perchlorate-contamination/ to the more accurate one above now and corrected the errors in the body of the document.

Leave a Comment


Latest Additions to SCVNews.com
1928 - Little dam victim, thought unidentified & buried in SCV, actually ID'd & buried in Chatsworth [story]
Newhall Cowboys
Los Angeles County Public Works is updating the Los Angeles County Bicycle Master Plan.
April 16:  County Bicycle Master Plan Virtual Community Meeting
College of the Canyons mens golf got back on track during its return to conference play on Monday, carding a five-man score of 370 to top the eight-team field at Brookside Golf Course and maintain its unblemished conference mark.
Cougars Win Again, Keep Conference Streak
Los Angeles County Treasurer and Tax Collector, reminds property owners that the second installment of the 2023-24 Annual Secured Property Taxes becomes  delinquent if not received by 5 p.m. Pacific Time or United States Postal Service postmarked on or before Wednesday, April 10, 2024.
County Treasurer Reminds Property Owners of April 10 Due Date
Local nonprofit Fostering Youth Independence is seeking “Allies” to support Santa Clarita youth who are aging out of the L.A. County foster care system.
April 16: FYI Seeks Volunteers To Pair With Local Foster Youth
The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health today unveiled the latest L.A. County Health Survey, which gathers vital data on health behaviors, conditions, neighborhood settings, and the needs of L.A .County residents, informing future public health policies and programs.
Public Health Unveils the 2023 L.A. County Health Survey Findings
Due to the projected rain forecast, Eggstravaganza will now be held indoors at the Canyon Country Community Center beginning promptly at 10 a.m. on March 30.
March 30: Eggstravaganza Now Being Held Indoors at Canyon Country Community Center
To support the mental health of California's young people, the California Department of Public Health awarded $25 million to 28 tribal and community-based organizations across the state.
California Announces $25 Million in Awards for Youth Mental Health
The College of the Canyons Athletic Department will host a dedication ceremony to unveil the Michele Jenkins Softball Team Room in honor of the longtime board member and ardent softball program supporter’s nearly 40 years of service to the district.
April 16: COC to Host Michele Jenkins Team Room Dedication Ceremony
PFLAG Santa Clarita has announced the establishment of the Peggy and Jeff Stabile PFLAG SCV Scholarship. The scholarship will provide financial assistance to LGBTQIA+ students pursuing higher education and committed to advocating for LGBTQIA+ rights and promoting diversity and inclusion.
PFLAG SCV Announces Stabile PFLAG Scholarship
1934 - Bouquet Canyon Reservoir, replacement for ill-fated St. Francis Dam & reservoir, begins to fill with water [story]
Bouquet Reservoir
The California Department of Public Health launched the “Never a Bother” campaign, a youth suicide prevention public awareness and outreach campaign for youth, young adults, and their parents, caregivers, and allies.
California Launches New Youth Suicide Prevention Campaign
The Santa Clarita Master Chorale invites the community to "Let the Sunshine In," a delightful evening of food, wine and song at the annual Cabaret & Cabernet fundraising benefit.
April 20: Santa Clarita Master Chorale’s Cabaret, Cabernet Fundraiser
The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health cautions residents who are planning to visit the below Los Angeles County beaches to avoid swimming, surfing, and playing in ocean waters:
March 27 Ocean Water Warning
As an integral ingredient necessary to help the Santa Clarita Valley to flourish, feedback from the business community is the secret sauce for achieving great things.
SCVEDC Asks For the Business Community’s Opinion on Santa Clarita
Raise your heart rate while raising funds for the Santa Clarita Sister Cities Dollars-for-Desks campaign to provide school desks for students in Sariaya, Santa Clarita's Sister City in the Philippines.
April 13: Sister Cities Zumba-thon Fundraiser
Remo, Inc. is is the world's leading manufacturer and developer of synthetic drumheads and shells. They’ve been in business for 60 years
SCVEDC Company Spotlight: Drumming Up Big Business with Remo, Inc.
California State Assemblywoman Pilar Schiavo (D-Chatsworth) and Assemblyman James Ramos (D-Highland) have introduced AB 3074 the "School or athletic team names: California Racial Mascots Act."
Schiavo Introduces Bill to Prohibit ‘Derogatory’ School Mascot Names
Los Angeles County’s Justice, Care and Opportunities Department  in collaboration with Local Initiatives Support Corporation Los Angeles is proud to announce the 2nd Annual Pitch Competition for the cohorts of JCOD's Incubation Academy.
March 28: JCOD Incubation Academy Helps Grassroots Non-Profits For the Second Year
Children’s Bureau is seeking foster families and now offers two virtual ways for individuals and/or couples to learn how to help children in foster care while reunifying with birth families or how to provide legal permanency by adoption.
April 18: Children’s Bureau Hosts Virtual Orientation
The Sunburst track was constructed in 1887 by the Southern Pacific Railroad and was a part of the main line running between San Francisco and Los Angeles.
Enjoy Spring With a Ride On The Sunburst Track
California State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond hosted a Personal Finance Summit today where he announced his support for Assembly Bill 2927 (McCarty), legislation that would require a personal finance education course for California high school graduation.
State Superintendent Announces Support for Personal Finance Graduation Requirement
1847 - Probable birth date of Pico Canyon oil driller Charles Alexander Mentry [story]
C.A. Mentry
SCVNews.com