Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas
[Ridley-Thomas] – Acting on a motion by Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas, and amendments from Supervisors Sheila Kuehl and Michael Antonovich, the Board of Supervisors called for drafting three potential November 2016 ballot measures asking voters to consider a parcel tax, a sales tax or a marijuana tax to pay for programs to address Los Angeles County’s crisis of homelessness.
The most recent poll commissioned by the County concluded more than 69 percent of likely November 2016 voters would support an annual 3 cent per square foot parcel tax to generate ongoing funding to address homelessness. Specifically, voters support a ballot measure that would provide prevention and emergency support services, including job training, rental subsidies, counseling and treatments for mental illness, drug and alcohol addiction; as well as create permanent and temporary affordable housing for children, seniors, families, foster youth, veterans, the disabled and homeless adults, with citizen oversight and independent audits.
“The quest to end homelessness has become the defining moral, civil rights and social justice issue of our time,” Supervisor Ridley-Thomas said in the motion. “Now is the time for the Board to identify an ongoing funding stream to put before voters in November that can finance the strategies to meaningfully prevent and reduce the number of homeless in communities across the County.”
The electorate’s growing concern about homelessness has been highlighted in more than 10 polls conducted since March by conservative and progressive pollsters, academic and philanthropic institutions, think tanks and municipal governments. The same surveys also indicate the electorate’s unprecedented willingness to increase taxes – whether through a tax on high-income earners, a parcel tax, sales tax or marijuana tax – to generate ongoing revenue to address the crisis.
The Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority has calculated at least $450 million is needed annually to provide the County’s homeless population of 47,000 with supportive services, rental subsidies and other needs. Studies have confirmed that successfully housing the homeless and linking them with support services and employment save taxpayer dollars in avoidable health, law enforcement, property devaluation, and other costs.
“These are really scary times – every neighborhood has encampments of people living on sidewalks,” said Lisa Payne with the Southern California Association of Nonprofit Housing or SCANPH. “This calamity calls out for government action. We urge you to seize the opportunity to seize a parcel tax or other funding measure on the ballot.”
Ann Sewill with the California Community Foundation said various polls showed “an outpouring of support from voters” for going to the ballot to raise money to address the homeless crisis. Addressing the Board, she said, “The pragmatic idea is we should do what wins. The visionary idea is we should do what’s right. I think you have an opportunity before you with this motion to do both.”
Chris Ko with United Way of Greater L.A. said, “Inaction is unthinkable, especially when lives are on the line.”
The Board directed Chief Executive Officer Sachi Hamai to present the draft tax initiatives on July 12. The Board could then vote to adopt one or multiple ballot measures for placement on the November 8 ballot.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
REAL NAMES ONLY: All posters must use their real individual or business name. This applies equally to Twitter account holders who use a nickname.
4 Comments
Really? Name one solution that Mark Ridley Thomas or the others on the Los Angeles City Council or County Board of Supervisors have come up with that have helped to solve the homeless problem? This goes back to the days of Homeless activist Ted Hayes and Mayor Tom Bradley’s office….millions and millions of dollars thrown at the problem, and yet it continues to grow and grow. It’s all well intentioned, but ineffective. Now we are going to throw additional billions at the problem….better get down to skid row now to see it before it disappears, I’m sure this time around they have found the magic potion.
Jerry Brown has caused California to already pay 60 cents a gallon already, the highest in the nation. More taxes? Where is the 60cents going?
Amen Jeff. People, do not believe the hype that all these groups claim about the polls. ANY reasonable taxpayer has to throw up in their mouth at another mention of more taxes. Notice how it’s ALWAYS the ‘rich’, land/property/home owners and business owners who are tapped into for these new taxes? Think about this, what do you think people would say if these nitwit legislators said this “We are going to take more taxes directly from EVERYONES’ paychecks to pay for our new pet project tax”……the majority would think twice about it, I guarantee it. But since they say it’s a tax on the ‘rich’ or land owner the overwhelming majority of people who are not rich or not land owners are going to say “sure!”. What a farce. What kind of oversight is there on homeless spending with our tax money now? This problem will NEVER go away, no matter how much money we throw at it. The more money you give this the bigger the industry will get. That’s right, industry. Just like global warming, people have built their livelihood on this farce. Do you think they would ever say “well, we have no more homeless people, guess I’ll find another cause to latch onto and make a living”, I don’t think so. They will ALWAYS be advocating no matter what the conditions because that is their profession, it’s how they make a living.
check