SCVNews.com | Opinion/Commentary: Death ‘Unfair’?

[Sign Up Now] to Receive Our FREE Daily SCVTV-SCVNews Digest by E-Mail

Inside

Weather

Calendar

Today in
S.C.V. History

April 24

1962 - SCV residents vote to connect to State Water Project, creating Castaic Lake Water Agency (now part of SCV Water) [story]

Death ‘Unfair’?

You Know I'm Right | Commentary by Betty Arenson

Betty Arenson | Friday, Aug 8, 2014

Click Here to Get Our 'SCV This Morning' Newsletter

Tweet This

Facebook

Digg This

Bookmark

Stumble

RSS

Second of two parts.

Last week I wrote about the controversy of those who believe in capital punishment and those who do not, and how neither side is able to convince the other their arguments are suitable.

The initial argument on the side of the opponents is that the death penalty makes the state as much of a killer as the convicted murderer. Also, that the penalty is improper because it’s just driven by revenge and is not really punishment.

I’m a total believer in America’s Constitution and its amendments as they stand today. With that, I cannot honestly argue that these convicted murderers do not have all of the afforded rights. It’s tough, but integrity must prevail.

Having said that, perhaps a lot of animus exists because we don’t have enough clarity on the boundaries, if any, that determine “rights.”

Yes, we must have due process. The accused, the defendant, irrespective of how much clear, adversary evidence exists, gets to plead “not guilty,” exercise every available “right” with counsel, and carry on.

Rights continue when, after a fair trial and a verdict is rendered, the (for the sake of this commentary’s subject) convicted murderer continues with appeals. Yes, he or she has that right.

It seems the disdain felt by many of us enters with decades and decades passing as defense lawyers tell us that either their guy or gal is really innocent, or if they are guilty, they should not pay with their life. This exhibition is exacerbated when pro-life groups step in with compassion for the guilty and absolutely none for the victim – the victim being dead, of course.

But what about the family and loved ones left behind?

I have yet to hear of one legislative proposal anywhere that calls for fast-tracking the criminal-case side as has been done on the civil side for decades. Set up a system to process these murderers, and if the outcome is that they will receive the ultimate penalty, then get it done. This circus has gone from death row inmates languishing with their “rights” for a decade to now 25 years in many cases.

U.S. District Court Judge Cormac J. Carney recently ruled against California’s death penalty when he overturned the death sentence for Ernest Dewayne Jones. Jones was sentenced to die for the 1992 rape and murder of his girlfriend’s mother, Julia Miller. This one, disastrous case could have very broad future weight.

Carney said: “There is no rational explanation, much less any moral or societal justification, for which people are ultimately executed. The execution of Mr. Jones, and others like him whose meritorious legal claims have gone unheard for decades, serves no valid state interest.”

I’ll bet large that the grieving families, left behind with big holes in their lives, would fervently disagree and be sickened by such detached, free-wheeling liberalism.

Carney’s reasoning seems ludicrous. He believes that all of the time delays result in constitutional violations relating to cruel and unusual punishment. Yes, these would be the same delays that result from murderers exercising their “rights.”

Old age is the biggest cause of death on death row. California hasn’t executed anyone since 2006 because courts stopped executions then. Carney said for every one death row inmate executed in California, seven others have died from natural causes.

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti is all warm and fuzzy with Carney’s decision. He concluded: “It further proves that the death penalty is broken beyond repair; it is exorbitantly costly, unfair and serves no legitimate purpose whatsoever. The only solution is to replace the death penalty with life in prison without possibility of parole.”

There are at least two problems with your ivory-tower point of view. One, there is no such thing as a life without possibility of parole, because there will always be parole hearings and the swearing of “I’ve found God,” and decades down the road, some bureaucrat feel-gooder will let the murderer out.

Garcetti’s second problem is simply offensive – “unfair and serves no legitimate purpose whatsoever.”

Let’s ask the left-behind, grieving families about that.

Lastly, as we speak, “state officials” are at fever pitch to establish a new psychiatric hospital for death row inmates. Yes, all 720 men at San Quentin will get mental health screenings. It’s a result of a ruling in December by U.S. District Judge Lawrence Karlton. No bureaucratic red-tape time delays here; the action is in full swing. Karlton’s ruling does not include 20 female prisoners at other locations with death sentences.

Berkeley law professor Franklin Zimring opines, in considering the federal court ruling that people cannot be executed if they don’t mentally understand, “We are curing them to make them executable.”

“This is the only place on Earth where you’d be talking about building a psychiatric hospital for condemned prisoner,” Zimring said. “It is a measure of American greatness and American silliness at the same time.”

Betty Arenson has lived in the SCV since 1968 and describes herself as a conservative who’s concerned about progressives’ politics and their impacts on the country, her children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren. She says she is unashamed to own a gun or a Bible, couldn’t care less about the color of the president’s skin, and demands that he uphold his oath to protect and follow the Constitution of the United States in its entirety. Her commentary publishes Fridays.

Comment On This Story

COMMENT POLICY: We welcome comments from individuals and businesses. All comments are moderated. Comments are subject to rejection if they are vulgar, combative, or in poor taste.
REAL NAMES ONLY: All posters must use their real individual or business name. This applies equally to Twitter account holders who use a nickname.

10 Comments

Jared Gardner says:

Friday, Aug 8, 2014 at

It seems you’d be better suited talking about plastic surgery disasters, rather than life issues you know next to nothing about.

Reply
- Brian Baker says:
  
  Saturday, Aug 9, 2014 at
  
  And perhaps the commenter would be better suited discussing the possibility of having a brain implant, rather than writing gratuitous and meaningless insults aimed at the columnist, who is clearly better educated and informed, and intellectually superior.
  
  It seems that’s the only bullet leftists have in their ammo belt: personal insults.
  
  Sadly for them, that one bullet is almost always a blank round.
  
  Reply
  - Bill says:
    
    Sunday, Aug 10, 2014 at
    
    Oh no,this woman is neither better educated or well informed. First of all, you’re either “pro-life” for ALL or you’re not PRO LIFE. It’s impossible to be “PRO LIFE” for some and not others because then you really wouldn’t be “PRO LIFE”. Again, nice that she has the Bible but she should try dusting it off and reading it. Love hypocrites.
    
    Reply
    - Brian Baker says:
      
      Sunday, Aug 10, 2014 at
      
      Oh, please. That doesn’t even pass the giggle test.
      
      You lefties always try to equate the death penalty and abortion, and it’s silly beyond description.
      
      When you can make an apples to apples comparison, THEN you may have a point.
      I’ll even give you the opportunity. Here it is. You ready?
      
      Name ONE aborted baby that committed a murder.
      
      I’ll await your answer with bated breath.
      
      Next time you want to talk about “hypocrites”, I suggest you hunt down a mirror first.
      
      Reply
J Schwartz says:

Saturday, Aug 9, 2014 at

I am against the death penalty for two reasons. First, it is not equally or equitably applied in all 50 states and there remains too high a percentage of innocent prisoners executed for crimes they did not commit. Execution is final and when we execute the innocent that is immoral.

But my greater reason is, I’d rather let these monsters rot in prison with no hope of parole because taking their life is just too easy on them. You note that many of them constantly petition the state for new trials or other delaying tactics and that’s because they have hope, the hope that some parole board or technicality can let them out. We should continue to deny them that hope of freedom and let them live out their lives with that because that’s all these individuals really care about; regardless of claims they are seldom sorry they murdered someone, they remain sorry they were caught. This point was demonstrated again this week with the denial of parole by Gov. Brown (who I think is doing a pretty good job of it overall by the way) who denied yet again the parole of convicted Manson family murderer Bruce Davis. Yes, if it were me and I lost a family member to one of these monsters, I would be enraged to the point that my primal urge to take their life would be expressed, but I know would ultimately derive enormous satisfaction watching them plead for their freedom and see it denied. But that is probably just me.

Reply
Brian Baker says:

Saturday, Aug 9, 2014 at

“… there remains too high a percentage of innocent prisoners executed for crimes they did not commit.”…..

As far as I’m aware, that percentage in the modern era is zero.

Do you have some other facts you’d like to submit?

Reply
- J Schwartz says:
  
  Sunday, Aug 10, 2014 at
  
  Brian – Gladly. Generally no way to know for certain if an innocent man or woman was executed since most lawyers are reluctant to take up the research once a prisoner has been executed, and it depends on where you look.
  This site suggests it may be as few as 10 people:
  http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/executed-possibly-innocent
  
  Per the Innocence Project:
  “Since 1977, some 553 people have been executed in the United States while another eighty death row inmates have been released after they were found innocent. For every seven executed, one innocent person is freed-an “error rate” of more than twelve (12) percent. In the State of Illinois, 12 people have been executed since 1977 while 13 have been released after proving their innocence-an error rate of 52 percent.”
  http://www.innocenceproject.org
  http://caught.net/innoc.htm
  
  And this doesn’t even count the number of people on death rows that may innocent and have not had their cases investigated. In any case, these numbers play the smaller part of my reasoning. What are your facts?
  
  Reply
  - Brian Baker says:
    
    Sunday, Aug 10, 2014 at
    
    Utter nonsense.
    
    “Generally no way to know for certain if an innocent man or woman was executed…”
    
    Or, in plain English, your claim that “… there remains too high a percentage of innocent prisoners executed for crimes they did not commit.” is pure speculation unsupported by any actual facts. Political posturing.
    
    Meaningless gibberish. Just as I wrote earlier.
    
    As to people who were later “found innocent”: in some of those cases, the system worked. If they actually WERE “innocent”, they weren’t executed, were they?
    
    And I’m aware of some of those cases in which the alleged “innocence” is based on recanted testimony years after the trials. In other words, we’re supposed to believe that the person who admits to lying at the time of trial is now telling the truth.
    
    Kind of a quandary, isn’t it? That person is an admitted liar and perjurer. So now the question becomes: WHEN were they lying and perjuring themselves? Then, at trial, or now?
    
    But the bottom line is this: you still haven’t presented a single fact proving that anyone in the modern era has been an “innocent prisoner executed for crimes they did not commit”.
    
    Reply
J Schwartz says:

Sunday, Aug 10, 2014 at

Meant to also add: if I appear to hold the state to a higher standard than the murderer, it is because it is the state’s obligation is to represent a higher legal and also moral authority in these matters. One life lost due to a failed or improper prosecution is intolerable diminishes us all.

Reply
Brian Baker says:

Sunday, Aug 10, 2014 at

I’m going to take this one step further.

If the alleged “innocent victim” is the only criterion we’re going to use to determine whether or not the death penalty should be maintained, then I submit we must also lower the freeway speed limits to 15 MPH, ban airline flights, ban ocean liners and ferries, and take all kinds of other drastic steps to protect “innocent” people from losing their lives “wrongfully”.

The reality is that we accept the possibility of “innocent” deaths as a cost of realizing the benefits of all kinds of things.

The Founders knew this when they wrote the Constitution, and even though the possibility of a “wrongfully” executed person was much greater back in that era, they specifically allowed the death penalty, as stated in the Fifth Amendment:

“No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury… nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law…”.

Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Opinion Section Policy

All opinions and ideas are welcome. Factually inaccurate, libelous, defamatory, profane or hateful statements are not. Your words must be your own. All commentary is subject to editing for legibility. There is no length limit, but the shorter, the better the odds of people reading it. "Local" SCV-related topics are preferred. Send commentary to: LETTERS (at) SCVNEWS.COM. Author's full name, community name, phone number and e-mail address are required. Phone numbers and e-mail addresses are not published except at author's request. Acknowledgment of submission does not guarantee publication.

Kathryn Barger | Statement in Support of $45.4B County Budget

Tuesday, Apr 23, 2024

Los Angeles County Fifth District Supervisor Kathryn Barger issued a statement in support of the Los Angeles County Chief Executive Officer’s presentation of a $45.4 billion budget for the forthcoming 2024-25 fiscal year.

Marcia Mayeda | Current Challenges in Animal Sheltering

Monday, Apr 22, 2024

Recently I had the opportunity, along with spcaLA President Madeline Bernstein and Inland Valley Humane Society & SPCA President Nikole Bresciani, to meet with NBC 4 reporter Kathy Vara to discuss the current challenges facing animal sheltering organizations.

Ken Striplin | Visit Skyline Ranch Park – Santa Clarita’s Newest Amenity

Monday, Apr 22, 2024

As city manager for 12 years now and a longtime resident of Santa Clarita, I am always proud to see how our community continues to grow.

Barger Issues Statement on Newly Approved Rental Housing Habitability Program

Tuesday, Apr 16, 2024

Supervisor Barger issued the following statement today, after the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to implement the Rental Housing Habitability Program

Ken Striplin | Kick Up Your Heels at Santa Clarita Cowboy Festival

Monday, Apr 15, 2024

Cowboy Festival weekend is upon us!

Jason Gibbs | Explore the World at Celebrate!

Thursday, Apr 11, 2024

Have you ever wanted to journey to another country to experience an array of new and unique cultures and customs?

Latest Additions to SCVNews.com


May 9: Blues Traveler to Perform at PAC The Grammy-award winning rock ‘n’ roll group Blues Traveler will take the stage of the Santa Clarita Performing Arts Center at 8 p.m. May 9.	Today in SCV History (April 24) 1962 - SCV residents vote to connect to State Water Project, creating Castaic Lake Water Agency (now part of SCV Water) [story]	Kathryn Barger \| Statement in Support of $45.4B County Budget Los Angeles County Fifth District Supervisor Kathryn Barger issued a statement in support of the Los Angeles County Chief Executive Officer’s presentation of a $45.4 billion budget for the forthcoming 2024-25 fiscal year.	Hannah Waddingham Officially Christens Sun Princess In a celebration held Tuesday, April 23 at the Port of Barcelona, award-winning actress and performer Hannah Waddingham officially welcomed the newest and most innovative Princess Cruises ship, Sun Princess, serving as godmother during a star-studded naming ceremony.	Hart District High Schools Recognized Best in Nation Six comprehensive high schools in the William S. Hart Union High School District which includes Canyon, Golden Valley, Hart, Saugus, Valencia and West Ranch have been ranked among the top public high schools in the country by U.S. News & World Report.	COC Offers Four Summer Sessions for Flexible Learning Options College of the Canyons will offer four summer sessions running from June 3 through Aug. 17, giving students a variety of options in both class format and scheduling designed to help them achieve their educational goals, from launching a new career to transferring to a four-year university.
Wilk’s Illegal Dumping Bill Approved by Committee California State Sen. Scott Wilk, R-Santa Clarita, announced his measure to combat illegal dumping, by increasing penalties and closing a loophole which has enabled the problem for years, was approved in the Senate Public Safety Committee.	May 18: Super Jazz Festival at West Ranch High School Super Jazz at the Ranch, a daylong jazz festival hosted by West Ranch High School, is happening Saturday, May 18. Music will fill the air as performers from throughout the region showcase their talents.	Schiavo Presents Healthy Homework Act to Prioritize Mental, Physical Health California State Assemblywoman Pilar Schiavo, D-Chatsworth, has presented The Healthy Homework Act (AB 2999) to the Assembly Education Committee.	West Creek Park Playground Closed for Repairs The city of Santa Clarita has notified the public that the playground at West Creek Park, 24247 Village Circle Drive, Valencia, CA 91354, is currently closed for repairs on the rubberized surface.	May 18: NextGen MediaMakers Festival Invites Creatives, Students, Experts to Celebrate Media The Santa Clarita Valley Media Collaborative invites local creatives, media industry professionals, students, parents, teachers and others to celebrate the next generation of media makers participating in the inaugural NextGen MediaMakers Festival on Saturday, May 18 from 2-5 p.m. at the Canyon Country Community Center.	Today in SCV History (April 23) 1986 - COC board votes to allow Argentine cliff swallows to nest forever on sides of buildings [story]
DACC Pays Recognition to Volunteers As Volunteer Appreciation Week approaches, the County of Los Angeles Department of Animal Care and Control wishes to extend heartfelt gratitude to all its dedicated volunteers who tirelessly contribute to DACC's mission of advancing the well-being of animals and people in the County.	April 24: Canyon Country Farmer’s Market Celebrates Two-Year Anniversary The Canyon Country Farmers Market will be celebrating their two-year anniversary Wednesday, April 24.	Henry Mayo Auxiliary Fulfills $600K Patient Tower Pledge The Henry Mayo Newhall Hospital Auxiliary presented a $35,000 check Monday to the Henry Mayo Newhall Hospital Foundation for the foundation’s Patient Tower Capital Campaign.	Entries Needed for ‘Creature Feature’ Art Show The Acton/Agua Dulce Arts Council has announced a call for entries for "Creature Feature," a juried art exhibition, with a theme of any living creature.	Acton/Agua Dulce Arts Council Announces Call for Photographers The Acton/Agua Dulce Arts Council has announced a call for entries for a juried exhibit open to all photographers, both professional and amateur.	Marcia Mayeda \| Current Challenges in Animal Sheltering Recently I had the opportunity, along with spcaLA President Madeline Bernstein and Inland Valley Humane Society & SPCA President Nikole Bresciani, to meet with NBC 4 reporter Kathy Vara to discuss the current challenges facing animal sheltering organizations.
Ken Striplin \| Visit Skyline Ranch Park – Santa Clarita’s Newest Amenity As city manager for 12 years now and a longtime resident of Santa Clarita, I am always proud to see how our community continues to grow.	Filming in Santa Clarita Includes Six Productions The city of Santa Clarita’s Film Office released the list of six productions currently filming in the Santa Clarita Valley for the week of Monday, April 22 - Sunday, April 28.	Henry Mayo Celebrating National Volunteer Week Henry Mayo Newhall Hospital is recognizing its valued volunteers during National Volunteer Week April 21-27.	L.A. County Unveils $45.4B Recommended Budget	April 23: Saugus Union to Discuss 2023/24 Personnel Report The regular meeting of the Saugus Union School District Governing Board will take place Tuesday, April 23, with closed session beginning at 5:30 p.m., followed immediately by public session at 6:30 p.m.	April 24: COC Board of Trustees’ Self-Evaluation Workshop The Santa Clarita Community College District Board of Trustees will hold a self-evaluation workshop Wednesday, April 24, beginning at 2 p.m.