[KHTS] – Residents seeking answers about Santa Clarita’s so-called toxic “donut hole” should have two opportunities this week.
Santa Clarita is hosting a multijurisdictional task force meeting at City Hall on Wednesday at 3:30 p.m., and later the same day, the Whittaker Bermite Citizens Advisory Group is meeting at 7 p.m. at the Santa Clarita United Methodist Church at 26640 Bouquet Canyon Road (at Espuella Road).
Jose Diaz, project manager for the Department of Toxic Substances Control, which oversees the investigation and cleanup of the Whittaker Bermite facility, will be at both meetings, he said.
The 996-acre plot in the middle of Santa Clarita – which is where the “donut hole” nickname comes from – was split into seven OUs, or operable units, including the groundwater, which is considered the seventh unit.
Only about 120 acres are contaminated, Diaz said, and of that land, about 20 acres have been cleaned.
The goal for the cleanup is 2016, federal officials said.
Background
Women assemble fuses at Bermite Powder Co., circa 1955. Click for info.
The Bermite Powder Co., and Halifax Powder Co. before it, manufactured explosives, flares and small munitions in Saugus, on the parcel just southeast of Bouquet Junction, from at least the early 1930s to 1987, according to SCVHistory.com.
Bermite and the Saugus property played an important role in the needs of the U.S. military during World War II, the Korean War and the Vietnam conflict, the site states.
For example, the most widely used air-to-air missile in the West, Raytheon’s AIM-9 Sidewinder, started production in 1953 at China Lake and used a Hercules/Bermite MK-36 solid-fuel rocket engine that would have been tested and manufactured at the Saugus plant.
However, there weren’t really guidelines for the disposal of those materials at the time and, before laws banning such action were implemented, the property’s owners would often burn waste or use nearby canyons as a dumping ground, Diaz said.
The result was soil contamination that federal officials are in the process of cleaning up.
“Right now, they’re in the process of doing a lot of preparation for the implementation of the remedial action plan for operable units 2-6,” Diaz said.
Whittaker Corp. agreed to pay a fine of nearly a half-million dollars in April 1998, when DTSC determined the company mishandled toxic and hazardous materials on the property, according to SCVHistory.com.
1957 advertisement. Click for more.
Contamination
There are two types of contaminants on the land – perchlorates, an inorganic chemical used in the manufacture of solid rocket fuel and other explosives, believed to harm the thyroid gland, and volatile organic compounds, or VOCs, Diaz said.
In OU 5, there’s no landfill, he said. The majority of the landfills are in OU4 and OU3.
In total, only about 500 acres of the 996-acre plot are developable, Diaz said, according to an estimate given to developers when they looked at the land’s potential. That’s due to the existence of ridgelines, streams and other parcels that could make development difficult cost prohibitive.
“Out of those 400 acres, 120 or so are contaminated,” Diaz said, “and perhaps 10-15 acres would have to be restricted usage.”
Most of those areas lie in OU3, which is colloquially known as Burned Valley.
“It’s an area where they burned waste and buried the ashes,” Diaz said, referring to past users of the land.
Some of the difficulty in the cleanup for the land that’s expected to remain restricted is the type of soil in the OUs, Diaz said.
“When you have solvents, you want to find sandy soil so you can extract them,” Diaz said, “but here you have a lot of clay.”
“And (Burned Valley) is in a canyon, so you’d have to move two ridges out of the way (to fully clean the area),” he said.
A drinking-water well next to the Saugus Cafe is tested for perchlorate contamination in 2003. Photo by Leon Worden.
Deadlines
There’s no reason for federal officials to doubt their 2016 deadline, Diaz said, although he added that a portion of the land could always be subject to restricted usage.
“There are some areas that they may not be able to develop,” Diaz said, referring to potential plans for the area’s future.
Some of the OUs have clay-like soil, which is harder to clean than sandy soil, Diaz said.
In those areas, DTSC officials are doing the best they can due to the necessity to handle the contamination carefully, so as not to spread the pre-existing damage.
“Because of air pollution rules, we have to operate a soil vapor extraction system,” Diaz said. “Essentially, we suck out the contaminants out of the ground with a vacuum and the air is filtered.”
But even with state of the art cleaning methods, the depth of the contamination in some areas is expected to leave problems behind long after the cleanup is completed.
“So they may not be able to clean (all of) it — so there won’t be unrestricted use,” he said, “it could be restricted for roads or commercial or open space.”
Officials still are developing a plan for the cleanup of the water in the area, Diaz said, and when the remedy is ready, a public meeting will be held to seek community input.
That’s expected to take place in May, he said.
The entire process, which DTSC officials have been involved in since the 1980s, will have to be completed before any approvals or zoning of the land can be completed, Diaz said.
The “drop-dead deadline” is 2019, Diaz said, because that’s when the insurance purchased by Whittaker when it sold the property in 1999 runs out.
“That’s really truly the drop dead deadline,” he said.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
REAL NAMES ONLY: All posters must use their real individual or business name. This applies equally to Twitter account holders who use a nickname.
9 Comments
I wonder if the city council would put there vote for it if they were held responsible for any sickness or contamination.
I will be there to ask that question. I think not only they should but there children should be held also. see how confident they really are????
Who the hell are the toxic police??!
I worked there for a few weeks around 1969 ! To scary, I did not last long!
The 2019 “drop dead” deadline is a new wrinkle to me. When I was a member of the original Citizen’s Advisory Group (or CAG) starting in the 90’s, we were always told that the “cradle to grave” responsibility for the complete clean-up belonged to Whittaker-Bermite. 20 years later and it is unknown if the clean-up will be completed before the (assumed) responsibility is transferred to the new owners when Whittaker’s insurance runs out. I wonder if the new owners have the financial wherewithal to complete it. Or will they walk away like others have?
Hi Jerry! (Leon here.) That’s what I find interesting about this story. I’ve only heard cradle to grave. I think there are (at least) 2 questions here: whether it’s true that the cleanup is somehow tied to the term of the insurance; and whether DTSC thinks it is.
Interesting, yes but disturbing – absolutely! Perhaps Perry can do a follow up interview and article with more specific questions? I plan on attending the MJTF meeting Wednesday. Curiouser and curiouser…
I briefly worked there.
Well, I went to the meeting today and, from what I learned by talking to several major players, 2019 is not a drop dead date. There are some insurance policies that end at that time but Whittaker still has cradle to grave responsibility for the cleanup and, if necessary, will pick up the tab for any work still being performed after that. There are several different types of remediation work that are being or will be performed. The completion schedule is dependent upon how things go as they progress. DTSC and Whittaker will be there until remediation is complete. The land is owned by a couple of possibly bankrupt LLC’s and has a lot of liens and entitlements encumbering future sale or development. Cleanup would probably go faster if there were a new owner with a development to build.
(Leon): Hi Jerry! Glad to hear that. Would you care to write a guest commentary & discuss what’s going on?