The Santa Clarita City Council voted 3-0 Tuesday evening to open negotiations with Laemmle Theatres and a developer partner to bring a six-screen Laemmle art house cinema and a mixed-use development project with parking to Old Town Newhall.
Council members Laurene Weste and TimBen Boydston had to recuse themselves from the discussion and vote – Weste because she lives too close to the target location across from the Newhall Library, and Boydston because he runs a competing theater business (Canyon Theatre Guild) down the street.
The theater building and adjacent mixed-use development with 46 upstairs apartments over ground-floor retail stores would be located on the vacant lot bounded by Lyons, Main, 9th and Railroad. The property is owned by the city and its defunct redevelopment agency.
Greg Laemmle, president of Laemmle Theatres, anticipates the theater in Newhall could draw between 150,000 to 200,000 to Newhall annually.
“There’s an opportunity here to jump-start the development of what will be an authentic and vibrant environment in Newhall,” Laemmle said.
The subject property.
Under separate ownership, the new theater, on 12,000 square feet of the redevelopment block, and the 1-, 2- and 3-bedroom condo or apartment units and retail space on 37,500 square feet of the redevelopment block, would be handled by the city as two separate projects.
A 300-space public parking structure would be a component of the combined project, which is expected to generate an estimated $4 million in economic activity annually in an area the city has long been trying to revitalize.
Twenty public speakers addressed the council on the topic, all in favor.
“I want to see all this money that all of us spend elsewhere back in Santa Clarita,” said Dianne Erskine-Hellrigel.
Weste, addressing her council colleagues as a private citizen, said, “Congratulations to our community for staying the course to get to this day. … We all just want dinner and a movie.”
Now the city and the developers will begin to hammer out the details of a proposal to bring the project to fruition, which would likely include some sort of financial participation on the part of the city for the theater component.
Background
The city and its redevelopment agency purchased the two-acre block across from the new library in November 2008 with the intention of redeveloping it. Some of the property was leased; when tenants’ leases expired, the existing buildings were bulldozed to make way for a new project. A Laemmle-type theater had been in the plans for the site since 2005, along with a housing component and public parking. (Under state redevelopment law, 20 percent of redevelopment assets had to be set aside to improve the housing stock in blighted areas. The downtown area qualified.)
Then in early 2012 the Legislature and the governor canceled redevelopment throughout the state. In 2011, as redevelopment was unraveling, Santa Clarita’s redevelopment agency transferred some of its property to the city.
Today the block consists of nine parcels, some of which are owned by the city, some by the “successor agency” to the redevelopment agency, and some by the city on behalf of the housing obligation under the old redevelopment law.
In 2013, as required by state law after the termination of redevelopment, the city filed a “long-range plan” to sell off its redevelopment property.
Under the long-range plan, which the state accepted, the city said it would put the property to bid and sell it to a developer who would create a project consistent with the city’s Old Town Newhall redevelopment plan.
The city solicited bids from nearly 100 potential applicants. There were five responses. Three were tossed out because they didn’t include a theater or public parking.
The two qualifying bidders were Laemmle Theatres in partnership with Serrano Development Group/Pacific Coast Housing Development of Glendale; and Maya/HighRidge Costa.
After meetings with staff and a professional consultant and a subcommittee of Mayor Marsha McLean and Councilman Bob Kellar, the Laemmle/Serrano proposal floated to the top.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
REAL NAMES ONLY: All posters must use their real individual or business name. This applies equally to Twitter account holders who use a nickname.
27 Comments
Yes, please!
Exciting!
I’m down!
Oh how I love this idea!!!!!
Why is it that Weste never seems to vote on important issues?
It would be illegal for her to vote on this issue or the library or anything else that is within 1,000 feet of her home. State law. Conflict of interest because of potential personal gain or loss. When you’re a member of an elected body and you stand to gain or lose more than the average public you represent, state law doesn’t let you vote.
Thanks for the reply. I didn’t realize that.
One more question: Why didn’t she vite on the Einstein School issue when they wanted to go in the industrial park?
too far back, don’t remember. but you can pull up the council meeting on SCVTV.com; it will be explained in the council meeting (if that’s the case, which we don’t recall).
In tribute to our city’s history, I hope they give the building a western cowboy movie them.
This is so cool! Yay!
Yeah! about time. Finally the possibility of a grown up movie theatre.
Gentrification seems nearly complete in Newhall,.. I suppose it was just a matter of time
Ron Jones
BRAVO!!! :)
YES!!!!
YES!!!!
Karen Kaplan – have you seen or heard this?
Yes LAura I have
Karen Kaplan – have you seen or heard this?
Sounds great!!! :)
Sounds great!!! :)
Dean Allen Spunt
Finally. We’ll get to see movies without super heroes, robots, space aliens and explosions. The explosions part was redundant.
I am keeping my finger crossed. One of the best ideas City of SCV. I will surely support Laemmle Theatres in SCV…in fact today I drove to the Town Center 5 Laemmle (Encino) to see a highly recommended movie (I’ll see you in my dreams)…worth the drive.
We need this!
There is a lack of honesty here!
The theater will need to be constructed and subsidized totally using public funds.
Laemmle will not provide any investment in the community.
The anticipated costs will be over $20 Million of public funds.
The theater and city anticipate a total of 200,000 moviegoers in a year. That is almost 1,000 people a day. That is unrealistic.
Asking the public to subsidize this is just stealing our money!