The recent White House COVID-19 test accuracy for personnel (including the president) reveals that about 48 percent of results might be incorrect, although this is relatively similar to regular flu testing.
Inaccuracies in testing should not be acceptable, but they are, and they are allowable. Statistics play a role, while unfortunately (thank goodness) an explanation of false positives and negatives is beyond the scope of this commentary.
Still, science must prevail, and although not exact, the “odds” plague medicine (forgive the pun) in testing and treatment.
If you have been stricken with COVID-19, there is an antibody blood test to reveal your bodily response to the virus. With this test, also, there are inaccuracies which are acceptable.
Welcome to the world of modern medicine.
We are waiting for vaccine development, yet even then there will be a statistical potential for failure. Some of us recall in the 1950s and ‘60s the “Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval.” How about an “FDA Seal of Approval” for testing, at least providing some level of confidence for the American people?
Attaining 100-percent accuracy in testing and treatment will not occur until “Star Trek: The Next Generation.” The odds of this will be in about 350 years.
Gene Uzawa Dorio, M.D., is a geriatric house-call physician who serves as president of the Los Angeles County Commission for Older Adults and Assemblyman to the California Senior Legislature. He has practiced in the Santa Clarita Valley for 32 years.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
REAL NAMES ONLY: All posters must use their real individual or business name. This applies equally to Twitter account holders who use a nickname.
1 Comment
I have lost faith in the FDA. Many years ago I was diagnosed with an ulcer and prescribed Zantac before it was approved for OTC sales. Yes, it worked, but at what cost? Currently there is a class action lawsuit against the manufacturers of Zantac because it has been shown to cause cancer. Many drugs are touted on TV that now have similar lawsuits filed against them including Abilify, Cymbalta, Lyrica, Nexium, Paxil, Plavix and Zoloft. This is just a sample; there are far many more drugs on the list. Either Big Pharma has too much control over the FDA or the FDA doesn’t do due diligence in testing new drugs. Furthermore, I can remember a time when prescription medicines couldn’t be advertised on television. Now, patients flock to their doctors demanding prescriptions for drugs they are sure will be a panacea for whatever ails them. Another one of the contributors to this crisis is the drug reps who have no background whatsoever in biology or chemistry. They are hired just to push drugs. My son is a drug addict, specifically heroin and meth. He was prescribed OxyContin when his wisdom teeth were removed. I read Beth Macy’s book Dopesick which chronicled how OxyContin was marketed in the Appalachia and quickly spread a harrowing tale of horror and misery of opioid addiction throughout the United States. The manufacturer of the drug assured doctors it was not addictive. OxyContin has destroyed millions of families. The FDA has lost its credibility. I am not blaming doctors. They abide by FDA recommendations. I believe prescription drug manufacturers should not be allowed to advertise on television. I believe drug reps should have a background in pharmacology. I believe the FDA needs to be more diligent in its testing procedures. Big Pharma is destroying too many lives and the FDA is an impotent agency that cannot be trusted.