SCVNews.com | Opinion/Commentary: Nature Lovers Too Radical for Tejon Open Space?

[Sign Up Now] to Receive Our FREE Daily SCVTV-SCVNews Digest by E-Mail

Inside

Weather

Santa Clarita CA

Mostly cloudy
47°F

Calendar

Today in
S.C.V. History

March 24

1922 - Wyatt Earp's wife thanks William S. Hart for defending her husband's honor [story]

Nature Lovers Too Radical for Tejon Open Space?

Commentary by Helen Sweany

Helen Sweany | Friday, Jan 3, 2020

Click Here to Get Our 'SCV This Morning' Newsletter

Tweet This

Facebook

Digg This

Bookmark

Stumble

RSS

Does anyone remember the protests of the 1960s? I was too young to be a part of it, but from what I’ve seen on the History Channel, all kinds of things were done to create a voice regarding Vietnam, equality, economic disparity and the environment.

I’m proud to say – and it wasn’t even on my bucket list – that I’ve recently been banned from Tejon Ranch Conservancy. I think they consider me an activist, but I’m not quite sure.

What did I do to be added to the List of the Exiled?

If I’m going to brag about this status to my grandchildren, I should at least know what I did.

I asked the Tejon field trip scheduler, “Why?” and he frustratingly said, “I can’t tell you.”

The only way you can hike or even drive through Tejon Ranch land is to live or work there or pay $20 per visit. I’ve been paying to hike the property for 10 years with no problem. These hikes are always in groups and with Tejon Ranch Conservancy employees as escorts. In November, I organized another field trip for a group of paid hikers and was stunned to get an email the night before the trip at the eleventh hour, stating I was one of two people excluded from the very hike I planned for them.

I had to figure out what I did wrong. This is what I learned:

Tejon now forbids you on their conservation property if you belong to environmental groups including but not limited to the Sierra Club, Audubon Society, California Native Plant Society, Center for Biological Diversity, the Natural Resources Defense Council, Endangered Habitats League, and Planning and Conservation League.

This list was recited by Tejon employees just before we would begin a hike, with a verbal warning that you can’t be on the land if you’re a member.

All of these organizations are suing Tejon for a number of different violations that Tejon is not honoring from a 2008 agreement. The agreement gave $15.8 million in taxpayer dollars to allow easements to scientists and researchers. Tejon took the public funds and instead banned the very people they were supposed to allow easements.

The friends I know who are members of naturalist groups are kind of nerdy. Rather than spend free time making money, they provide data and teach future biologists and scientists – i.e., school kids. They are teachers, nature lovers, parents, grandparents and even volunteer docents at our state parks. It’s not the way to make the big bucks. It’s a way to make it better for future generations.

Being a member of one of these groups couldn’t be the reason I was banned, because I was not (yet) a member of any of them.

Tejon’s property recorded 2,000 residents in the 1850s of Kawaiisu, Kitanemuk, Yokuts, Chumash and Tataviam tribes living on their ancestral land. Families were forced off their own homes and property through four Mexican land grants. Some of the descendants still live in nearby Bakersfield.

This is not my ancestry, so it shouldn’t be Tejon’s fear that I would file for reparations.

News articles over the years have no consistency as to how many homes are to be built on this land. For clarity, it’s actually two projects: Centennial (L.A. County) with 19,333 new homes, and Tejon Mountain Village (Kern County) with 17,000 new homes, for a total of 36,333. Of the Tejon bus tours I’ve been on, our guides consistently said these homes will be built as gated communities on 1 acre of land each. No tours I’ve been on have ever mentioned any construction of low-income housing or apartments.

I live on the wrong side of the Grapevine, and when it closes, I’m stuck. This happens about 10 times a year. It also means I can’t go home or leave home when the barricades are up. There are no other back roads. The 5 Freeway is “it.” The Grapevine closes when cars or trucks turn over or crash; in mudslides, high winds, fire, snow or ice. Like a weird game of musical chairs, when it closes, the hundreds of cars and big rigs on this stretch are trapped for up to 36 hours.

I can’t imagine 75,000 more cars on “the most treacherous part of the 5 Freeway” which, according to Caltrans, “already claim(s) more than its share of casualties.”

This property sits on two major earthquake faults, the 185-mile Garlock Fault (a 7.1 happened on July 6, 2019, and produced a bulge in the land observed by satellite radar images) and the 800-mile San Andreas Fault. Fort Tejon was struck by a 7.9 from the San Andreas in 1857, the largest recorded earthquake in continental U.S. history. Geologists claim California is long overdue for it to strike again.

Where will the water come from for the 100,000 new residents of these two communities? I was told by my Tejon chaperones that the 12,000 head of cattle have priority over future homeowners. The business of growing almonds and other water hungry crops will also remain.

Tejon doesn’t worry about water for new communities because the East Branch of the California Aqueduct passes through Tejon Conservancy, and Tejon has easements to guarantee they receive water. What happens when the tides quickly turn and we’re back in extreme drought, and now have these additional water consumers vying for the same water that is needed elsewhere?

Tejon geography is similar to the Paradise Fire where 85 people died. Like Paradise, it’s placed in a high fire-hazard severity zone with wind gusts recorded as high as 90 mph. Like Paradise, there’s only one way out to Interstate 5 from these proposed new towns, should there be a disaster that residents need to flee.

This brings me no closer to learning why I was banished. Could it be Tejon Ranchers have begun to pay Facebook researchers to scan social media posts for anything “negative” about the area? Was it something I said?

I’ve read that Lennar Corporation – a Miami-based real estate company that bought Newhall Ranch in 2004 – might be funding this project. Centennial has been approved by Los Angeles County, yet construction has not begun. Is Lennar having second thoughts?

If my job was with Lennar to make money for investors in the real estate business, I know I’d reconsider.

Helen Sweany is a nature lover who would live inside the Oak of the Golden Dream if she could. She is not now and never has been a member of the Center for Biological Diversity.

Comment On This Story

COMMENT POLICY: We welcome comments from individuals and businesses. All comments are moderated. Comments are subject to rejection if they are vulgar, combative, or in poor taste.
REAL NAMES ONLY: All posters must use their real individual or business name. This applies equally to Twitter account holders who use a nickname.

4 Comments

Waterwatecher says:

Friday, Jan 3, 2020 at

Maybe not such a good idea to make agreements with these folks. They don’t seem to keep there promises, That’s why there was that tree sit in Stevenson Ranch – developer promise not kept. Now Tejon. I wonder how the Center for Biological Diversity, California Native Plant Society and Wishtoyo will make out. They took 15 million to settle on Newhall Ranch, Sort of strange with all the endangered species there. Now that they get this money they have agreed to submit letters saying they don’t oppose any of Fivepoint/Lennar’s projects in the SCV.

Reply
jim says:

Saturday, Jan 4, 2020 at

Don’t confuse the “tree sit” in Stevenson Ranch for the issues herein. They may be distantly related as in “protecting the environment” but the Tejon Ranch is a whole ‘nother thing.

Much like the Bixby Ranch properties along the California coast, these properties go back in history (whether or not you like it) and come with specific and important restrictions and grants.

As for “promises” made for these large (thousands of acres) ownership properties in California, I’m not a lawyer or licensed realtor so my only thoughts are my own.

Unless the State of California is willing to buy out the current owners (at a reasonable price) all of these lands continue to be privately owned. That prevails even if the current owners do not intend to maintain or manage the properties as other people wish them to do so.

Would it be a wonderful thing if all of the Tejon Ranch properties could be restored to their native conditions and preserved for the controlled and managed use for all of Californians? Absolutely!

But if that is what you want then you need to besiege Governor Newsome and the State Legislature to make that happen.

It’s not like we’re talking about pristine native eco-culture here; much of the property has been a working ranch for more than 120 years. Plenty of this information is available online. And don’t start me on Edward F. Beale!

I’m not pitching an argument for or against Tejon Ranch and it’s business concerns regarding development of parts of that gigantic property. That’s a lot of square miles of private property.

However, it seems to me that unless there is a groundswell of public opinion (not likely – most folks haven’t a clue what or where it is), changes will be up to the Counties involved, and the politicians affected, not to mention the landowners (corporate these days; no more Spanish Conquistador stuff)whose job it is to make a profit.

If more than 1% of Californians know who or what Tejon Ranch is I would be surprised. If 2% care whether or not the two developments were approved I would be equally surprised.

I know that we are not in the same world as California City out in the Mojave desert where a developer scammed people into buying lots of flat desert land back in the early ’60’s by promising a thriving and vibrant real estate market.

This is not that. The rules have changed enough so that is unlikely if not possible anymore. But property rights haven’t changed that much, and the right to develop a property still exists in California. It’s a lot more expensive now, and a lot more political than back then.

Back to the beginning; I would love to see the entire Tejon Ranch become a marvelous example of historic Californeo land holdings, with protected but still accessible access…within limits. Much of the agricultural property cannot be easily restored to pristine conditions. But maintaining some of it as historic (and useful) farming could be an important historic resource.

The highlands are mostly unscathed (at least so far under the current global warming scenarios) and could become a wonderful resource for those hardy enough to spend time in and traverse a wonderful part of California.

As for why Helen was booted out, I don’t know. I’ve only been on one trip through Tejon Ranch (maybe my last, I don’t know – even though I don’t belong to ANY groups) so her knowledge is greater than mine.

I would be remiss if I didn’t note that when big money is at stake, legal processes can certainly engender situations wherein nobody ends up happy: owners, users, and non-specific “stakeholders”.

I do believe that if Tejon Ranch and it’s supporters, antagonists, and all the other political aspirants cannot come together with a plan to both serve the property owners needs AND ensure access to the wonderful landscape and ecology, then all that wonderful land will be just there. Without us.

Reply
RonK says:

Sunday, Jan 5, 2020 at

I too have been banned from visiting Tejon Ranch. I signed a petition opposing the housing projects there about 10-years ago. I totally forgot about it, but when you sign up for a tour the apparently they do a background check. Like Helen, I am not an activist and have never protested anything in my life (and yes, I am old enough to remember Vietnam.)

What I think is unfair about this situation is that the State of California paid the developers $16 million for a conservation easement which is supposed to allow some sort of public to access the property. But, the Tejon Ranch Company still owns the land, so they can choose who gets to go and who doesn’t. Apparently, they have decided that anyone who ever did anything in opposition to their projects can never have access to the land. I think this is petty. And whatever happened to free speech?

If this was truly private property I wouldn’t have a problem, but since my tax dollars were used to pay for public access to the site, I think this terrible.

Reply
Jack Tuszynski says:

Tuesday, Jan 28, 2020 at

What I do not get is where are the reporters when you need one. Will someone please tell us exactly how much property tax Tejon pays for those cow dung pastures? I pay $600/year for an empty 2.5 acre lot next door. $600 x 15,000 (grapevine) 20,000 (centennial) 3500 (village) = alot more than $15.8 in taxpayer dollars that Tejon is being gifted. Tejon Mountain Village was given the green light eons ago. They are using the term “tentative building lots” to put the lots on the market for a developer without paying tax on “building lots”. Everyone else who holds onto a lot and waits for a golden opportunity to sell has to pay property tax. The money they pay consultants and lawyers to prolong these environmental issues is chump change compared to what they would pay in property tax. So one could say it plays into their strategy to jerk around. They have one project up for sale and two in the down the line basket.

Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Opinion Section Policy

All opinions and ideas are welcome. Factually inaccurate, libelous, defamatory, profane or hateful statements are not. Your words must be your own. All commentary is subject to editing for legibility. There is no length limit, but the shorter, the better the odds of people reading it. "Local" SCV-related topics are preferred. Send commentary to: LETTERS (at) SCVNEWS.COM. Author's full name, community name, phone number and e-mail address are required. Phone numbers and e-mail addresses are not published except at author's request. Acknowledgment of submission does not guarantee publication.

Ken Striplin | Read a Tale Along the Trail!

Thursday, Mar 23, 2023

Tucked between the River Village neighborhood at Duane R. Harte Park is one of the most unique and hidden amenities in Santa Clarita. Home to the city of Santa Clarita’s Trail Tales, this serene location offers families and visitors a beautiful spot to take a leisurely walk along the paseos while enjoying the shade of the massive oak trees and reading a children’s story displayed on podiums dotted along the path.

Marcia Mayeda | Protecting Animals – Commercial Pet Breeding

Friday, Mar 17, 2023

Last month I wrote about the general animal caretaking requirements set forth in Los Angeles County Code Section 10.40.010. Those requirements apply to both pet owners as well as operators of commercial animal facilities such as grooming salons, boarding kennels, wild animal facilities and pet shops.

Ken Striplin | New Amenities on the Horizon in Santa Clarita

Thursday, Mar 16, 2023

Every five years, the city of Santa Clarita publishes a strategic plan based on public input which identifies priorities and plans for enhancing the quality of life for our community.

SCOPE President Pens Letter to Amend County Oak Ordinance

Tuesday, Mar 14, 2023

Lynne Plambeck, president of the Santa Clarita Organization for Planning and the Environment (SCOPE), asks the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors to amend the County Oak Ordinance by means of a "Tune Up."

Ken Striplin | Drug Education, Awareness in Santa Clarita

Friday, Mar 10, 2023

Did you know that as little as two milligrams of Fentanyl, about the size of five grains of salt, can cause negative health effects including trouble breathing, dizziness, possible overdose and even death? With the recent uptick in Fentanyl deaths, especially among teenagers, we must work together as a community to eliminate drug abuse and educate our parents, teachers, caregivers and students on the dangers of taking drugs.

Cameron Smyth | Apply for a Job at the City!

Tuesday, Mar 7, 2023

As a teenager and throughout my adult life, I don’t remember a time when I wasn’t working. Whether it was working as a youth sports official in high school or being in the State Assembly, I have always loved and enjoyed the jobs that gave back to the community and worked directly with residents on a myriad of issues or projects.

Latest Additions to SCVNews.com


Today in SCV History (March 24) 1922 - Wyatt Earp's wife thanks William S. Hart for defending her husband's honor [story]	March 26: St. Stephen’s Hosts ‘Freedom Rider’ Joan Browning Via Zoom Joan Browning, "Freedom Rider," will appear via Zoom at St. Stephen’s Episcopal Church on Sunday, March 26 at 11:45 a.m.	Thursday COVID Roundup: Total SCV COVID Cases Near 98,900 The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health confirmed 12 new deaths throughout L.A. County, 767 new cases countywide and 15 new cases in the Santa Clarita Valley.	March 28: City Council Regular Meeting The Santa Clarita City Council will hold a closed session special meeting Tuesday, March 28, beginning at 5:30 p.m., followed immediately by the council's regular open public meeting at 6 p.m. in the City Council Chambers on the First Floor of City Hall, 23920 Valencia Blvd., Santa Clarita, CA 91355.	COC English Instructor Receives Statewide Hayward Award for Excellence in Education Angeli Francois, a College of the Canyons English adjunct instructor, has received a 2023 Hayward Award for ‘Excellence in Education’ from the Academic Senate for California Community Colleges for her dedication and commitment to serving and empowering students from diverse backgrounds and experiences.	May 31: Tickets on Sale for ’14th Annual State of the County’ The Santa Clarita Valley Chamber of Commerce has announced the 14th annual State of the County is scheduled for Wednesday, May 31 at 11:30 a.m. at the Hyatt Regency Valencia, 24500 Town Center Drive, Valencia, CA 91355.
April 4-8: Outlets at Tejon Golden Egg Scavenger Hunt Guests are invited to search for a golden egg decal placed on any of the Outlets at Tejon, 5701 Outlets at Tejon Parkway, Arvin, CA 93203. retail windows. The Golden Egg Scavenger Hunt will be held April 4-8.	April 1: Be the Boss of Your Money LifeForward Workshop A free, timely and important LifeForward workshop, “Be the Boss of Your Money – Make it Work for You!” hosted by Zonta Club of Santa Clarita Valley, will be held Saturday, April 1 from 10 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.	Ken Striplin \| Read a Tale Along the Trail! Tucked between the River Village neighborhood at Duane R. Harte Park is one of the most unique and hidden amenities in Santa Clarita. Home to the city of Santa Clarita’s Trail Tales, this serene location offers families and visitors a beautiful spot to take a leisurely walk along the paseos while enjoying the shade of the massive oak trees and reading a children’s story displayed on podiums dotted along the path.	Fostering Youth Independence Works to House Homeless Youth A total of 56 vulnerable foster youth have found housing with the help of Fostering Youth Independence since the local non-profit’s founding in 2017.	Vallarta Supermarkets to Move Corporate HQ to SCV The Santa Clarita Valley Economic Development Corporation has announced that California-based Vallarta Supermarkets will relocate its corporate headquarters from Pacoima to the Santa Clarita Valley in late 2023.	Canyon Trail Closed Due to Storm Damage Officials at Placerita Canyon State Park and Nature Center have closed the popular Canyon Trail, one of the park's longest trails, indefinitely due to damage from recent storms.
Today in SCV History (March 23) 1886 - Film director Robert N. Bradbury born in Washington state; launched John Wayne's career in Placerita Canyon [watch]	CSUN Women’s Tennis Extends Winning Streak Against Chaminade Playing for the third time in five days, the CSUN women's tennis team extended its longest winning streak since 2015 to nine as the Matadors defeated Chaminade 7-0. CSUN's nine-dual winning streak is tied for the fifth-longest in school history with the 2006 and 2015 teams.	Wednesday COVID Roundup: Santa Clarita Adds 22 New Cases to the Count The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health confirmed Wednesday no new deaths and 22 new cases in the Santa Clarita Valley, with 12 additional deaths and 537 new cases countywide.	April 7: Santa Clarita Library Brings Teen Fan Fest To Canyon Country Community Center The Santa Clarita Public Library is inviting teens and tweens to the Canyon Country Community Center for Teen Fan Fest.	May 20: Circle of Hope Announces Hoedown for Hope Circle of Hope Inc., a non-profit organization in Santa Clarita dedicated to providing emotional, financial, and educational support to individuals and families affected by cancer, is thrilled to announce their upcoming Hoedown For Hope Music Festival and BBQ fundraising event.	April 30: Art Show At La Chene French Cuisine The Santa Clarita Artists Association is presenting their 9th annual Spring Art Festival and Sale.
EY Gift to Support CSUN Accounting Students, Faculty Global accounting and consulting giant EY has donated $850,000 to support accounting students and faculty at California State University, Northridge.	Girl Scout Summer Camps Now Open For Enrollment Girl Scouts of Greater Los Angeles has openings at its all-girl summer camps and are enrolling now for camps that take place June through August. Openings are at day camps in Inglewood and Claremont, and overnight camps in Frazier Park.	100 Days Left to Renew Disabled Person Parking Placards Expiring in June Californians who need to renew a permanent disabled person parking placard before June 30, 2023, have 100 days left until their placards expire.	March 27: Plum Canyon Median Modification Begins Beginning Monday, March 27, crews will start the construction of median modifications, paving, grinding and overlay operations along Plum Canyon Road, between Bouquet Canyon Road and Skyline Ranch Road.	Today in SCV History (March 22) 1875 - Construction begins on San Fernando Railroad Tunnel [story]	Supes Approve Plan to Not House Serious Juvenile Offenders at Camp Scott On March 21, 2023, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved a motion adopting a plan for the County Probation Department’s halls and camps, specifically as it relates to establishing Secure Youth Treatment Facilities following the transfer of juvenile serious offenders from state to county custody.