SCVNews.com | Opinion/Commentary: Death ‘Unfair’?

[Sign Up Now] to Receive Our FREE Daily SCVTV-SCVNews Digest by E-Mail

Inside

Weather

Calendar

Today in
S.C.V. History

January 18

1899 - Martin & Richard Wood buy J.H. Tolfree's Saugus Eating House (still inside Saugus Depot), rename it Saugus Cafe [story]

Death ‘Unfair’?

You Know I'm Right | Commentary by Betty Arenson

Betty Arenson | Friday, Aug 8, 2014

Click Here to Get Our 'SCV This Morning' Newsletter

Tweet This

Facebook

Digg This

Bookmark

Stumble

RSS

Second of two parts.

Last week I wrote about the controversy of those who believe in capital punishment and those who do not, and how neither side is able to convince the other their arguments are suitable.

The initial argument on the side of the opponents is that the death penalty makes the state as much of a killer as the convicted murderer. Also, that the penalty is improper because it’s just driven by revenge and is not really punishment.

I’m a total believer in America’s Constitution and its amendments as they stand today. With that, I cannot honestly argue that these convicted murderers do not have all of the afforded rights. It’s tough, but integrity must prevail.

Having said that, perhaps a lot of animus exists because we don’t have enough clarity on the boundaries, if any, that determine “rights.”

Yes, we must have due process. The accused, the defendant, irrespective of how much clear, adversary evidence exists, gets to plead “not guilty,” exercise every available “right” with counsel, and carry on.

Rights continue when, after a fair trial and a verdict is rendered, the (for the sake of this commentary’s subject) convicted murderer continues with appeals. Yes, he or she has that right.

It seems the disdain felt by many of us enters with decades and decades passing as defense lawyers tell us that either their guy or gal is really innocent, or if they are guilty, they should not pay with their life. This exhibition is exacerbated when pro-life groups step in with compassion for the guilty and absolutely none for the victim – the victim being dead, of course.

But what about the family and loved ones left behind?

I have yet to hear of one legislative proposal anywhere that calls for fast-tracking the criminal-case side as has been done on the civil side for decades. Set up a system to process these murderers, and if the outcome is that they will receive the ultimate penalty, then get it done. This circus has gone from death row inmates languishing with their “rights” for a decade to now 25 years in many cases.

U.S. District Court Judge Cormac J. Carney recently ruled against California’s death penalty when he overturned the death sentence for Ernest Dewayne Jones. Jones was sentenced to die for the 1992 rape and murder of his girlfriend’s mother, Julia Miller. This one, disastrous case could have very broad future weight.

Carney said: “There is no rational explanation, much less any moral or societal justification, for which people are ultimately executed. The execution of Mr. Jones, and others like him whose meritorious legal claims have gone unheard for decades, serves no valid state interest.”

I’ll bet large that the grieving families, left behind with big holes in their lives, would fervently disagree and be sickened by such detached, free-wheeling liberalism.

Carney’s reasoning seems ludicrous. He believes that all of the time delays result in constitutional violations relating to cruel and unusual punishment. Yes, these would be the same delays that result from murderers exercising their “rights.”

Old age is the biggest cause of death on death row. California hasn’t executed anyone since 2006 because courts stopped executions then. Carney said for every one death row inmate executed in California, seven others have died from natural causes.

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti is all warm and fuzzy with Carney’s decision. He concluded: “It further proves that the death penalty is broken beyond repair; it is exorbitantly costly, unfair and serves no legitimate purpose whatsoever. The only solution is to replace the death penalty with life in prison without possibility of parole.”

There are at least two problems with your ivory-tower point of view. One, there is no such thing as a life without possibility of parole, because there will always be parole hearings and the swearing of “I’ve found God,” and decades down the road, some bureaucrat feel-gooder will let the murderer out.

Garcetti’s second problem is simply offensive – “unfair and serves no legitimate purpose whatsoever.”

Let’s ask the left-behind, grieving families about that.

Lastly, as we speak, “state officials” are at fever pitch to establish a new psychiatric hospital for death row inmates. Yes, all 720 men at San Quentin will get mental health screenings. It’s a result of a ruling in December by U.S. District Judge Lawrence Karlton. No bureaucratic red-tape time delays here; the action is in full swing. Karlton’s ruling does not include 20 female prisoners at other locations with death sentences.

Berkeley law professor Franklin Zimring opines, in considering the federal court ruling that people cannot be executed if they don’t mentally understand, “We are curing them to make them executable.”

“This is the only place on Earth where you’d be talking about building a psychiatric hospital for condemned prisoner,” Zimring said. “It is a measure of American greatness and American silliness at the same time.”

Betty Arenson has lived in the SCV since 1968 and describes herself as a conservative who’s concerned about progressives’ politics and their impacts on the country, her children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren. She says she is unashamed to own a gun or a Bible, couldn’t care less about the color of the president’s skin, and demands that he uphold his oath to protect and follow the Constitution of the United States in its entirety. Her commentary publishes Fridays.

Comment On This Story

COMMENT POLICY: We welcome comments from individuals and businesses. All comments are moderated. Comments are subject to rejection if they are vulgar, combative, or in poor taste.
REAL NAMES ONLY: All posters must use their real individual or business name. This applies equally to Twitter account holders who use a nickname.

10 Comments

Jared Gardner says:

Friday, Aug 8, 2014 at

It seems you’d be better suited talking about plastic surgery disasters, rather than life issues you know next to nothing about.

Reply
- Brian Baker says:
  
  Saturday, Aug 9, 2014 at
  
  And perhaps the commenter would be better suited discussing the possibility of having a brain implant, rather than writing gratuitous and meaningless insults aimed at the columnist, who is clearly better educated and informed, and intellectually superior.
  
  It seems that’s the only bullet leftists have in their ammo belt: personal insults.
  
  Sadly for them, that one bullet is almost always a blank round.
  
  Reply
  - Bill says:
    
    Sunday, Aug 10, 2014 at
    
    Oh no,this woman is neither better educated or well informed. First of all, you’re either “pro-life” for ALL or you’re not PRO LIFE. It’s impossible to be “PRO LIFE” for some and not others because then you really wouldn’t be “PRO LIFE”. Again, nice that she has the Bible but she should try dusting it off and reading it. Love hypocrites.
    
    Reply
    - Brian Baker says:
      
      Sunday, Aug 10, 2014 at
      
      Oh, please. That doesn’t even pass the giggle test.
      
      You lefties always try to equate the death penalty and abortion, and it’s silly beyond description.
      
      When you can make an apples to apples comparison, THEN you may have a point.
      I’ll even give you the opportunity. Here it is. You ready?
      
      Name ONE aborted baby that committed a murder.
      
      I’ll await your answer with bated breath.
      
      Next time you want to talk about “hypocrites”, I suggest you hunt down a mirror first.
      
      Reply
J Schwartz says:

Saturday, Aug 9, 2014 at

I am against the death penalty for two reasons. First, it is not equally or equitably applied in all 50 states and there remains too high a percentage of innocent prisoners executed for crimes they did not commit. Execution is final and when we execute the innocent that is immoral.

But my greater reason is, I’d rather let these monsters rot in prison with no hope of parole because taking their life is just too easy on them. You note that many of them constantly petition the state for new trials or other delaying tactics and that’s because they have hope, the hope that some parole board or technicality can let them out. We should continue to deny them that hope of freedom and let them live out their lives with that because that’s all these individuals really care about; regardless of claims they are seldom sorry they murdered someone, they remain sorry they were caught. This point was demonstrated again this week with the denial of parole by Gov. Brown (who I think is doing a pretty good job of it overall by the way) who denied yet again the parole of convicted Manson family murderer Bruce Davis. Yes, if it were me and I lost a family member to one of these monsters, I would be enraged to the point that my primal urge to take their life would be expressed, but I know would ultimately derive enormous satisfaction watching them plead for their freedom and see it denied. But that is probably just me.

Reply
Brian Baker says:

Saturday, Aug 9, 2014 at

“… there remains too high a percentage of innocent prisoners executed for crimes they did not commit.”…..

As far as I’m aware, that percentage in the modern era is zero.

Do you have some other facts you’d like to submit?

Reply
- J Schwartz says:
  
  Sunday, Aug 10, 2014 at
  
  Brian – Gladly. Generally no way to know for certain if an innocent man or woman was executed since most lawyers are reluctant to take up the research once a prisoner has been executed, and it depends on where you look.
  This site suggests it may be as few as 10 people:
  http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/executed-possibly-innocent
  
  Per the Innocence Project:
  “Since 1977, some 553 people have been executed in the United States while another eighty death row inmates have been released after they were found innocent. For every seven executed, one innocent person is freed-an “error rate” of more than twelve (12) percent. In the State of Illinois, 12 people have been executed since 1977 while 13 have been released after proving their innocence-an error rate of 52 percent.”
  http://www.innocenceproject.org
  http://caught.net/innoc.htm
  
  And this doesn’t even count the number of people on death rows that may innocent and have not had their cases investigated. In any case, these numbers play the smaller part of my reasoning. What are your facts?
  
  Reply
  - Brian Baker says:
    
    Sunday, Aug 10, 2014 at
    
    Utter nonsense.
    
    “Generally no way to know for certain if an innocent man or woman was executed…”
    
    Or, in plain English, your claim that “… there remains too high a percentage of innocent prisoners executed for crimes they did not commit.” is pure speculation unsupported by any actual facts. Political posturing.
    
    Meaningless gibberish. Just as I wrote earlier.
    
    As to people who were later “found innocent”: in some of those cases, the system worked. If they actually WERE “innocent”, they weren’t executed, were they?
    
    And I’m aware of some of those cases in which the alleged “innocence” is based on recanted testimony years after the trials. In other words, we’re supposed to believe that the person who admits to lying at the time of trial is now telling the truth.
    
    Kind of a quandary, isn’t it? That person is an admitted liar and perjurer. So now the question becomes: WHEN were they lying and perjuring themselves? Then, at trial, or now?
    
    But the bottom line is this: you still haven’t presented a single fact proving that anyone in the modern era has been an “innocent prisoner executed for crimes they did not commit”.
    
    Reply
J Schwartz says:

Sunday, Aug 10, 2014 at

Meant to also add: if I appear to hold the state to a higher standard than the murderer, it is because it is the state’s obligation is to represent a higher legal and also moral authority in these matters. One life lost due to a failed or improper prosecution is intolerable diminishes us all.

Reply
Brian Baker says:

Sunday, Aug 10, 2014 at

I’m going to take this one step further.

If the alleged “innocent victim” is the only criterion we’re going to use to determine whether or not the death penalty should be maintained, then I submit we must also lower the freeway speed limits to 15 MPH, ban airline flights, ban ocean liners and ferries, and take all kinds of other drastic steps to protect “innocent” people from losing their lives “wrongfully”.

The reality is that we accept the possibility of “innocent” deaths as a cost of realizing the benefits of all kinds of things.

The Founders knew this when they wrote the Constitution, and even though the possibility of a “wrongfully” executed person was much greater back in that era, they specifically allowed the death penalty, as stated in the Fifth Amendment:

“No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury… nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law…”.

Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Opinion Section Policy

All opinions and ideas are welcome. Factually inaccurate, libelous, defamatory, profane or hateful statements are not. Your words must be your own. All commentary is subject to editing for legibility. There is no length limit, but the shorter, the better the odds of people reading it. "Local" SCV-related topics are preferred. Send commentary to: LETTERS (at) SCVNEWS.COM. Author's full name, community name, phone number and e-mail address are required. Phone numbers and e-mail addresses are not published except at author's request. Acknowledgment of submission does not guarantee publication.

Laurene Weste | Preserving the Past, Building the Future at Hart Park

Friday, Jan 16, 2026

There are places in our community where history is not simply remembered, but carefully safeguarded and brought to life every day. William S. Hart Park is one of those rare treasures.

Pilar Schiavo | California State Budget

Tuesday, Jan 13, 2026

Assemblywoman Pilar Schiavo (D-Chatsworth) released the following statement on Friday, Jan. 9 in response to Governor Gavin Newsom's proposed 2026–27 State Budget.

Kathryn Barger | One Year Later

Saturday, Jan 10, 2026

This week marked the one-year anniversary of the Eaton Fire. As I reflect on the past year and look toward what lies ahead, my message to survivors is clear: I see your pain, I respect your resilience and I remain committed to walking with you on the long road ahead.

Councilwoman Marsha McLean | New Year, New Amenities

Friday, Jan 2, 2026

As we usher in a new year, I want to wish you and your family a very happy and healthy 2026.

Ken Striplin | Happy New Year, Santa Clarita

Friday, Jan 2, 2026

It’s hard to believe 2025 is now in the rearview mirror.

Happy New Year and Becoming Father Time

Monday, Dec 29, 2025

The end of the year points out that time speeds up as you get older, or get bored, or think too much.

Latest Additions to SCVNews.com


Today in SCV History (Jan. 18) 1899 - Martin & Richard Wood buy J.H. Tolfree's Saugus Eating House (still inside Saugus Depot), rename it Saugus Cafe [story]	Today in SCV History (Jan. 17) 1994, 4:31 a.m. - Magnitude 6.7 Northridge earthquake rocks Santa Clarita Valley [video]	Lady Mustangs Power Past OUAZ On the Road A strong defensive performance by The Master's University Lady Mustangs basketball team led to a 73-45 win against OUAZ in Surprise, Ariz.	Tejon Ranch Conservancy Offers February Nature Programs The Tejon Ranch Conservancy has published its calendar of nature programs it will host in February.	Jan. 20: SUSD to Meet in Closed Session with City Regarding Santa Clarita Elementary The regular meeting of the Saugus Union School District Governing Board of Trustees will be held Tuesday, Jan. 20 beginning at 6:30 p.m. The board will first meet in closed session at 5:30 p.m.	Hart District’s Collyn Nielsen Named ACSA Negotiator of the Year The William S. Hart Union School District has announced that Dr. Collyn Nielsen, Deputy Superintendent, Human Resources, has been named the 2026 Negotiator of the Year by the Association of California School Administrators.
Jan. 20: City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission Plans Site Tours The city of Santa Clarita Planning Commission has scheduled a site tour of the Princessa Crossroads Specific Plan Project and a virtual tour of the Belcaro at Sand Canyon Project. These projects are expected to hold public hearings in the near future.	COC SBDC Hosting Free Webinars to Help Grow Businesses Free business training webinars are available from the College of the Canyons Small Business Development Center this January.	March 7: ‘Live From Santa Clarita, It’s Saturday Night’ SCVHS 50th Anniversary The Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society will celebrate its 50th anniversary with a unique gala on Saturday, March 7, 6-10 p.m.	Saugus High Music Clothes for Cash Fundraiser Saugus High School Instrumental Music gives back while raising much-needed funds for the high school's music program.	Feb. 10: Non-Profit Council Roundtable’s ‘Non-Profit Love Match’ at Child & Family Center Join the Santa Clarita Valley Chamber of Commerce for a special Non-Profit Council Roundtable, "Non-Profit Love Match: A High-Impact Networking Experience for Professionals & Nonprofits," 5-6:30 p.m. Tuesday, Feb. 10 at the Education Center at Child & Family Center.	Laurene Weste \| Preserving the Past, Building the Future at Hart Park There are places in our community where history is not simply remembered, but carefully safeguarded and brought to life every day. William S. Hart Park is one of those rare treasures.
Jan. 18: CBS Film Series Presents ‘Truth & Treason’ Congregation Beth Shalom offers a monthly film series that shows selected independent films one Sunday per month at 2 p.m.	CDPH Reminds Retailers, Public About Dangers of Kratom, 7-OH Products The California Department of Public Health is collaborating with the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration to remind consumers and retailers that products containing kratom or 7-hyrdroxymitragynine, commonly known as 7-OH, are associated with addiction, serious harm, overdose and death.	Foothill League Soccer: The Big Push Foothill League soccer is coming into a final flurry of league matches that will sort out standings.	Jan. 18: Valencia FivePoint Farmers Market Free Cooking Demonstration The Valencia FivePoint Farmers Market will offer a special live cooking demonstration and tasting on Sunday, Jan. 18.	Jan. 19: California State Parks to Offer Free Vehicle Entry on MLK Day In honor of Martin Luther King Jr. Day, Governor Gavin Newsom announced that California residents and visitors will receive free vehicle day-use entry to participating California state parks on Monday, Jan. 19.	Today in SCV History (Jan. 16) 1926 - Newhall Community Hospital, est. 1922, opens in larger, more modern hospital building at 6th & Spruce streets [story]
Jan. 19: Schiavo to Host MLK Day of Service, Donations Encouraged Assemblywoman Pilar Schiavo will host the Third Annual MLK Day of Service on Monday, Jan. 19. The event will be held 11:30 a.m.-1 p.m. at the Santa Clarita Vallet Boys and Girls Club Thomas E. Dierckman Clubhouse.	Jan. 18: Ridge Route Preservation Organization Work Day The Ridge Route Preservation Organization will host a Ridge Route Storm Clean Up Day Sunday, Jan. 18 at 7 a.m.	Jan. 17: Santa Clarita Community Hike in Quigley Canyon Open Space The city of Santa Clarita January Community Hike will be held Saturday, Jan. 17, at 10 a.m. in the Quigley Canyon Open Space, Cleardale Avenue, Santa Clarita, CA 91321.	Jan. 22: City of Santa Clarita to Break Ground on Via Princessa Park The city of Santa Clarita invites the community to celebrate the groundbreaking of Via Princessa Park on Thursday, Jan. 22, at 10 a.m.	Jan. 29: ‘Teen Library Eats: Ramen Noodle Bar’ at Canyon Country Library Canyon Country Jo Anne Darcy Library will host a "Teen Library Eats: Ramen Noodle," event Thursday, Jan. 29, 4-5 p.m. at 18601 Soledad Canyon Road, Santa Clarita, CA 91351.	Traffic Alert Issued for SCV Water Pipeline Installation on Smyth Drive The city of Santa Clarita has issued a traffic alert for Smyth Drive in Valencia.