SACRAMENTO – The California Senate on Wednesday unanimously approved Senate Bill 333, a measure to address California’s homeless crisis, according to Senator Scott Wilk (R-Santa Clarita), the bill’s co-author with Assemblyman Tom Lackey (R-Palmdale).
SB 333 would require the Homeless Coordinating and Financing Council to develop and implement a long-term, strategic plan to combat homelessness across the state, complete with specific goals and benchmarks.
“Walk down the street in any community in California and you will see the depth and breadth of our homeless crisis,” said Wilk, who represents the state’s 21st Senate District.
“It is not limited to one age, demographic or gender. Women and children, who are often left without shelter when there is a problem at home are living on the streets,” he said. “If California is serious about helping people get back on their feet and off the street, we have to be equally serious about ensuring homeless dollars are not wasted in the bureaucracy.”
SB 333 stems from a report released last year by the California State Auditor who, at the request of Wilk and Assemblyman Tom Lackey, investigated California’s statewide efforts to solve this homeless problem and found woeful inadequacies.
In 2018, California had 134,000 residents without a home on any given night, according to data provided by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the homeless population has spiked significantly in the past several years.
“This bill will hold state government accountable in its effort to address homelessness and ensure that not a single cent from the taxpayer goes to waste,” Wilk said. “This crisis is just too big and too critical to do otherwise.”
SB 333 addresses several recommendations from the State Auditor’s report. Specifically, the bill requires the Homeless Coordinating and Financing Council to develop and implement a statewide, strategic plan to address homelessness in California, including goals and objectives and timelines for achieving them and metrics for measuring their achievements.
SB 333 will now go to the California Assembly for consideration.
Tom Lackey and Scott Wilk.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
Tweet This
Facebook
Digg This
Bookmark
Stumble
RSS
REAL NAMES ONLY: All posters must use their real individual or business name. This applies equally to Twitter account holders who use a nickname.
1 Comment
I am a disabled senior living at an “Affordable Housing” low income apartment complex. I received a rent increase of $50.00 a month more (5% increase), which with my Social Security income being extremely low, puts my rent at OVER 100% of my income. I get no housing assistance. I inquired about the L.A. County rent moratorium with a 3% max cap for our unincorporated area but mgmt. stated that because they are an L.I.H.T.C. facility they are EXEMPT! They are governed by IRS, Sec. 42, which reads that the property owner or initial contributors receive annual tax credits but says nothing about tenants benefits or rights! Who has the final authority to raise or freeze rents? Please help as I am 30 days away from getting an EVICTION notice and becoming HOMELESS!