[KHTS] – The Castaic Area Town Council voted 6-4 this week to accept funds from Chiquita Canyon Landfill in exchange for their support of the expansion of the dump once the final environmental documents are released.
SEE COMPLETE DRAFT CONTRACT BELOW
The landfill has yet to reach a deal with residents of Val Verde, which is where the dump is located.
Nearly 50 people, the majority from the Val Verde, attended Wednesday’s Town Council meeting, said Erica Larsen, a Val Verde resident and member of the Citizens for Chiquita Canyon Landfill Compliance.
The speakers from Val Verde were opposed to the agreement that was on the table, she said.
The public comment period ends Oct. 23 for the environmental report on the project’s expansion. The county extended the deadline for 30 days at the request of community members and several groups including the Santa Clarita City Council.
A key part of the financial arrangement gives 80 cents per ton – based on annual disposal amounts – to the Castaic and Val Verde communities, said John Musella, spokesman for the Chiquita Canyon Landfill.
“(The CATC) agreed to split the funds with 70 percent to Val Verde and 30 percent to Castaic,” he said. “Basically, what that means is in the first year, Castaic would receive approximately $240,000 (according to 2013 tonnage), and Val Verde is set to receive $560,000.”
The landfill is negotiating with two groups, the Town Council and the Val Verde Community Advisory Committee. The VVCAC has yet to agree to terms, Musella said.
The amount of money has the ability to go up, as Chiquita Canyon’s expansion calls for an increase in the daily tonnage the landfill would receive. The deal would go on for the length of the landfill’s operation.
Musella said that could be in approximately 21 years and, if approved, this would be the last expansion for the landfill.
The Castaic agreement was voted upon Wednesday night and while the Val Verde residents attended the meeting and voiced their concerns against the landfill, the Val Verde community Advisory Committee have not finalized their agreement yet, Musella said.
Some residents who were upset with the terms complained of “loopholes” that they said negated guarantees to the communities, and Castaic resident Lloyd Carder said the deal seemed like “hush money” to “keep the council quiet.”
The money is planned to go to a new nonprofit organization, the Chiquita Canyon – Castaic Community Benefit Fund, Musella said. It will not go directly to the council.
“This is a great opportunity for the community of Castaic,” Musella said. “These funds will be available to support the schools, youth programs and the local community in general. It’s not often a local business is able to contribute hundreds of thousands of dollars annually to a local community.”
Musella said the deals have been part of a yearlong negotiation, but some area residents felt the process was being rushed.
“It was kind of sad. People were talking about how the council members should not vote, that they should get legal advice and postpone the vote and (the council members) just voted on it,” Larsen said. “So it was kind of hard to watch that it just got pushed through so fast.”








Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
REAL NAMES ONLY: All posters must use their real individual or business name. This applies equally to Twitter account holders who use a nickname.
7 Comments
Chad Pearce soon I’ll be able to come legally dump my trash in your backyard
Vote no!!!
I’ve been to Val Verde and Chiquita landfill. I didn’t see a difference
Hello Perry, thanks for the article!
A small note: the Chiquita Canyon landfill is not located in Val Verde, it is located in Castaic. What would have been nice to see is a screen shot of how close the landfill will be to the neighborhoods of Live Oak and Hasley Hills. The expansion is moving in their direction and they are downwind.
According to the Draft Environmental Report – and the 1997 agreement – the landfill is located in Val Verde. Both define Val Verde as including all of Township 4 North, Range 17 West, S.B.M. —which is where the landfill is.
Just to clarify, I was misquoted as saying the Citizens for Chiquita Canyon Landfill Compliance was opposed to the expansion. The group does not have a formal position on the expansion.
The group’s main concern is for compliance of the landfill to environmental and contractual requirements. We feel the landfill is not currently operating under compliance and are working to correct the situation. Likewise, The Draft Environmental Impact Report poses many concerns as it is written and the group is working to maintain the safety of the surrounding residents, employees and children coming in to attend schools.
I also want to correct the quote “All were opposed to the agreement on the table.” I believe this statement was in regard to the majority of the audience members and clearly not the council members (hence the passing of the agreement).
One last thing… there is a “Carder” mentioned in the article but this person is not identified.
Thank you for writing this article… my intention is not to discourage just to correct my quotes.
Thank you, Perry for clearing that up. You are right, the DEIR states that Chiquita is located in Val Verde. I have always seen the mailing address of the landfill under “Castaic.” I suppose it is like many of us in Val Verde use Verde/Castaic interchangeably with postage.