[CN] – August’s steep and sudden drop in water conservation after more than a year of impressive savings has California drought regulators questioning whether cities are ignoring conservation rules that have just been relaxed.
Statewide water savings declined to 17 percent in August – down from 27 percent in August 2015 – and sparked concern within the California State Water Resources Control Board on Wednesday.
“The statewide August conservation results raise questions,” board chair Felicia Marcus said in a statement. “Are we seeing relaxation of conservation messaging and programs, or are we seeing abandonment of programs?”
In May, the regulator voted to nix stringent statewide drought orders that called for a 25 percent conservation target, allowing California’s more than 400 water suppliers to set their own targets. The water board called the plan a “trust-and-verify approach” that requires cities and water suppliers to self-certify their water supplies and ensure that a minimum three-year supply exists in case of extended drought.
Many cities and water suppliers jumped at the opportunity to lower their targets and loosen the taps to collect on lost revenue.
Marcus said Wednesday that some cities are still “conserving up a storm,” while others may be taking advantage of the relaxed rules.
“We urge suppliers where conservation levels have dropped steeply to reach out to high-use customers to find way to conserve and to join their community’s conservation efforts,” she said.
In its monthly drought update, the water board stressed the need for water suppliers to continue pushing conservation messages and dialogue with customers. It also warned that it’s possible that top-down conservation laws could return in January if totals don’t improve.
The diluted August totals come as California enters its sixth straight year of drought. With Oct. 1 marking the official start of the water year, more than 83 percent of the Golden State is experiencing drought, and 62 percent of the state is in severe drought.
While forecasters initially warned of La Nina conditions this winter, the formation of El Nino’s drier cousin has recently slowed in the Pacific Ocean. Scientists are now predicting a 55 to 60 percent chance of neutral conditions in the Pacific this winter — neither El Nino nor La Nina.
Since Gov. Jerry Brown’s drought orders went into effect June 2015, Californians have combined to save 23 percent compared to 2013 levels.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
Tweet This
Facebook
Digg This
Bookmark
Stumble
RSS
REAL NAMES ONLY: All posters must use their real individual or business name. This applies equally to Twitter account holders who use a nickname.
7 Comments
If SCV City Hall continues to approve the building of more homes and industrial centers and businesses I will not conserve my water. If you want to set and example then so us we need to conserve and STOP BUILDING !!!!!!!!!
If SCV City Hall continues to approve the building of more homes and industrial centers and businesses I will not conserve my water. If you want to set and example then show us we need to conserve and STOP BUILDING !!!!!!!!!
The city of Santa Clarita does not provide water. The water agencies do. You’re talking about punishing one agency for the actions of another. (And punishing yourself, when the water agency charges you more for using more water.)
Never said the city provided water to residents. I said that if were under a water restriction then why is the city continuing to build and create more of a water shortage. Kind of simple logic don’t you think? If you had very little money in your bank account and had to conserve, would you invite people to come stay with you. I know I wouldn’t but then again common sense isn’t too common these days.
Whoops! He’s got you there Leon. Expanding the number of users in the local water districts simply adds to the City’s usage of State and local water supplies. And of course that includes the usage of connected users outside the City.
Perhaps the CLWA takeover of the last independent water supplier will change that. Once all local water retailers are under the roof of the water importer, the combined local resources and imported resources will be enough to meet all local needs.
Until the next big project.
Jim – I just don’t understand the use of the term “city.” Other areas (like the city of Los Angeles) have water under the jurisdiction of a city; we don’t. And most of the new development in the Santa Clarita Valley is approved not by the city but by the county of Los Angeles — which, except in Val Verde, also doesn’t control or manage the water supply.
You’re right, though, about the studies that show improved efficiencies and cost savings for water users (us, the people) when the water purveyors are under one roof.
This proves we have a resource water board with no common sense. Did they really think people would continue to restrict their water use once restrictions were lifted? Sounds like the builders have gotten to the California State Water Resources Control Board.