header image

[Sign Up Now] to Receive Our FREE Daily SCVTV-SCVNews Digest by E-Mail

Inside
Weather
Santa Clarita CA
Clear
Clear
65°F
 
Calendar
Today in
S.C.V. History
July 3
1925 - By letter, Wyatt Earp beseeches his friend William S. Hart to portray him in a movie, to correct the "lies about me." Hart never did. [story]
Hart-Wyatt Earp


The Newhall Ice Co. building on 5th Street can’t be demolished without City Council approval, under the new ordinance.

The Santa Clarita City Council approved a reduced list of historic properties Tuesday and re-addressed the process for demolishing a building if the city deems it historic.

The 3-1 vote, with Bob Kellar voting “no” and TimBen Boydston abstaining due to his management of a building on the list, OK’d 11 structures – plus those in Heritage Junction Historic Park – to be designated as historic.

The buildings are:

* The Newhall Ice Co. (5th Street)

* Sheriff Substation #6 (now part of Canyon Theatre Guild)

* Tom Mix Cottages (two structures on Main Street)

* Three structures at Melody Ranch (Main Gate, Gene Autry House, Barn)

* California Star Oil Company / Standard Oil House (now a private home)

* Old Newhall Jail (next to Old Town Newhall Library)

* American Legion Hall / American Theater (next to library)

* Santa Clarita Courthouse (at Railroad & Market)

 

Under a 2008 ordinance that remains in place until the new preservation ordinance takes effect, 43 properties are deemed historic. The new ordinance relieves most of them from the designation.

The new ordinance requires property owners raise the standard for property owners who wish to demolish one of the 11 historic structures. Instead of obtaining a demolition permit over the counter from the city’s planning division, the permit would have to be approved by the City Council. The ordinance gives the council the right, in such a case, to require that the building be moved to a location such as Heritage Junction or to a city park.

The new ordinance provides additional incentives for owners of designated properties, such as a city grant of up to $25,000 for improvements that don’t changed the structure’s historic character, and an exemption from certain permit fees.

There’s also an opt-in clause for property owners who would like to put their structures on the list.

The point of providing incentives, said Councilwoman Laurene Weste, was to encourage the preservation of history.

Councilman Bob Kellar saw it as a property-rights issue and appeared uncomfortable with the idea of endorsing any historic preservation ordinance, regardless of whether it reduced the number of eligible properties.

“I’m not comfortable telling somebody you have to be on a list,” Kellar said. “If it said ‘opt in,’ I’d be all for it, but I see (the ordinance) as a serious infringement on property rights.”

Councilwoman Marsha McLean directed questions to City Attorney Joe Montes about the differences between the new and old ordinances. Montes said there will be fewer properties affected, the city is creating a formal process for adding or changing such properties, and incentives are being added to encourage owners to opt-in.

“All we’re doing,” said Mayor Frank Ferry, “is the same ordinance (as 2008) minus the 35 properties and adding the ability to move the (historic building), and it also provides funding to support” an owner who wants to move his or her property.

As drafted, the ordinance would require the property owner to bear the responsibility and cost of moving a historic building. Council members directed the city staff to change that provision and allow for the city to bear some or all of the cost. A final ordinance will be prepared for a subsequent council meeting.

City planner Dave Peterson said it would cost $15 to $30 per square foot to move a building. For the two Tom Mix Cottages on Main Street, that would come to approximately $30,000 per structure, but for the courthouse, the cost would be approximately $200,000.

“We’re not saying you can’t do anything (with your property),” Weste said. “We’re just saying you have to go through an approval process. The only issue is if you want to demolish (the property).”

Comment On This Story
COMMENT POLICY: We welcome comments from individuals and businesses. All comments are moderated. Comments are subject to rejection if they are vulgar, combative, or in poor taste.
REAL NAMES ONLY: All posters must use their real individual or business name. This applies equally to Twitter account holders who use a nickname.

1 Comment

  1. colinfragar says:

    Town planner help you in planning a town but it also help yo get approval from council approval and it not as easy as it look. Until and unless you have an experience in this field and also the knowledge of law. Help you in getting approval in limited time.

Leave a Comment


Keep Up With Our Facebook
Latest Additions to SCVNews.com
1925 - By letter, Wyatt Earp beseeches his friend William S. Hart to portray him in a movie, to correct the "lies about me." Hart never did. [story]
Hart-Wyatt Earp
1869 - Sanford Lyon (as in Lyons Avenue) appointed postmaster of Petropolis (today's Eternal Valley Cemetery) [story]
Sanford Lyon
1808 - Ygnacio del Valle born in Jalisco, Mexico; owned most of SCV [story]
Ygnacio del Valle
1943 - Army Air Force pilot Loncie L. Tucker, on training run, dies when his P-38 fighter crashes at Wayside Honor Rancho (later Pitchess Detention Center) in Castaic [story]
Loncie Tucker
SCVNews.com
%d bloggers like this: