Given a historic shortage of affordable housing, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors asked county departments Tuesday to assess the impact that short-term rentals such as Airbnb and VRBO can have on affordable residential rental housing in the county’s unincorporated areas, home to 10 percent of county residents.
The use of companies such as Airbnb and VRBO, which connect owners to travelers for short-term rentals, removes otherwise affordable rental apartments from the market for long-term occupancy.
Recent studies by LA Alliance for a New Economy found that the use of short-term rentals can cause landlords to take rental units off the market, a move that dramatically impacts rents and rental vacancy rates.
A 2015 study found that 7,316 units were taken off the rental market by the use of Airbnb, the equivalent of seven years of affordable housing construction.
Short-term rentals can also cause other community problems including destabilizing neighborhoods and affecting the quality of life due to increased traffic, crowded parking, noise and safety concerns.
Additionally, short-term rentals are not subject to the Transient Occupancy Tax paid by hotels. An appropriate TOT on short-term rentals could result in several million dollars in revenue for the county each year.
“Right now, we need to do everything within our power to ensure that we expand, not decrease, available affordable housing,” said Supervisor Sheila Kuehl, author of the motion. “We do not want to ban short-term rentals, but we want to ensure that short-term rentals do not have a negative impact on our very important work to reduce homelessness and our efforts to reduce the number of low- and moderate-income people who are being priced out of our local rental market.”
“The short-term rental market operates mostly outside the county’s regulation,” said Supervisor Kathryn Barger, co-author of the motion. “We want to be sure we have the necessary tools to oversee the lawful operation of this type of lodging, and this motion is a first step to understanding the current state of that market.”
This motion comes on the heels of recent county efforts to expand affordable housing, including passage of four ordinances last week and an increased investment in affordable housing construction of more than $100 million this fiscal year.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
REAL NAMES ONLY: All posters must use their real individual or business name. This applies equally to Twitter account holders who use a nickname.
1 Comment
LOW INCOME= BADNEWS.ID LOVE TO OWN A FERRARI BUT I CANT AFFORD IT. WITH YOUR THINKING THERE SHOULD BE A PLAN OUT THERE FOR PEOPLE WHO WANT BUT CANT AFFORD ONE.ITS EXPENSIVE TO LIVE IN SCV JUST HOW SOME OF US LIKE IT. WHY YOU ASK ? IT TENDS TO KEEP THE TRASH OUT OR DOWN TO A MINIMUM. BY CREATING PLANS LIKE THIS YOU HAVE JUST SLAPPED EVERY PERSON WHO WORKED HARD AND HAS MADE SACARFICES TO LIVE IN SUCH A NICE TOWN.IF PEOPLE CAN ONLY AFFORD VALLEY PRICES THEN THATS MAYBE WHERE THEY NEED TO MOVE.STOP MAKING EXCEPTIONS FOR PEOPLE SORRY BUT YOU CANT HAVE YOUR CAKE AND EAT IT TOO