So I stopped by City Hall last night and saw the usual billboard preservationists – the folks who are opposed to the billboard removal ordinance. They must really like the existing billboards a lot, because they sure are working hard to keep them.
One gentleman had a T-shirt that made me laugh out loud. Besides stating how he was going to vote on Measure S, it also had the words, “It’s a Bad Deal” that seemed to jump out at those reading it. I think it may have been shaped like my stomach – that is a bad deal.
I don’t get why those folks keep showing up and talking. The City Council of Santa Clarita knows what those folks want. Maybe it gives voice to a council member who always wants to be one of the people instead of a council member.
So they continue the protest, and only a few of us listen. Sort of like another gentleman who keeps showing up on a Facebook page, telling us all again how much he likes a certain candidate for Congress. I’ll be so very happy when we don’t have to read that any more.
So the T-shirted guy asked me why I care so much about stopping the expansion of the dump when I should be jumping on the anti-Measure S bandwagon. I told him his whole anti-billboard removal ordinance idea was based on a false premise, as I’ve explained in many of these commentaries, but the dump issue is one that is “in our valley,” and it is causing people in Val Verde to get sick.
People getting ill because of illegal dumping is a lot more important than three electronic billboards.
The gentleman seemed to lack understanding that it is the “whole valley” I’m concerned with and write about. He can’t seem to get beyond those billboards.
He can’t get beyond the fact that yes, it really is a real-estate leasing deal – it’s about companies that lease Metrolink property for billboards, and Metro wants the billboards taken down. They struck a deal, whereas Santa Clarita would allow a total of three electronic billboards on city land along I-5 and the 14 Freeway in exchange for taking down all of the billboards in the railroad right-of-way.
Now since it was and is a real-estate leasing transaction, it could not be discussed in an open meeting. City staff negotiated with the other parties to get some money for the city from the deal. It was then brought to the City Council for a vote.
Now one City Council member is very vocal in his rejecting what the other members of council voted to approve. He does that often. Recently he was at another agency’s meeting and spoke as a “citizen” and not a member of Santa Clarita City Council. He stated views that were opposite from those already approved by the other council members. Sore loser.
When I hear about a council member going out in public and saying that “as a citizen” he doesn’t agree with how the council voted, well, that is free speech, but it is also unethical and deserves the contempt of the citizens he is pledged to represent.
He reminds me of a certain congressional candidate who is taking a step over the line from the 26th to the 25th District in order to run for office. Back in the 26th, he is just a citizen. Here he is, by any other measure, a certified carpetbagger. He wants not to serve but rather he wants power.
On another election matter, I’m still 100 percent for Jim McDonnell for L.A. County Sheriff. He doesn’t have much baggage, does he? He would make the better choice as our new sheriff since he doesn’t have, at last count, 21 various charges against him by the grand jury. Gee, an honest sheriff. What a concept.
Darn. I keep coming back to the question I was asked: “Why are you so interested in Val Verde?” That gentleman also asked if I liked being on the losing side of a battle. Well, I don’t; that battle isn’t lost. It has a lot more support than the billboard issue. Val Verde is fighting without the big money help of the billboard companies. I actually think they have a chance to stop the expansion. It has a chance to save a few lives.
So that is how it goes. “Yes” on Measure S and “No” on the dump expansion.
A good friend told me that every time I write about the dump and all of its problems, I was helping some youth organization in some way. Usually it was because a charity that is located a far away from the dump site made a bunch of bucks with a new infusion of cash from the landfill operator.
I like that idea. You can always give to the best charity I know. That charity is named after me. If I’m here tomorrow, stand by. Great events will happen. Be willing. Take the steps. There are only two.
Darryl Manzer grew up in the Pico Canyon oil town of Mentryville in the 1960s and attended Hart High School. After a career in the U.S. Navy he returned to live in the Santa Clarita Valley. He can be reached at dmanzer@scvhistory.com. His older commentaries are archived at DManzer.com; his newer commentaries can be accessed [here]. Watch his walking tour of Mentryville [here].
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
REAL NAMES ONLY: All posters must use their real individual or business name. This applies equally to Twitter account holders who use a nickname.
7 Comments
Now Darryl has really gone and done it.
For the record, I did not ask Darryl to jump on any bandwagon. I do think that those who are opposed to the landfill expansion are wasting their time talking to a legislative body that has no jurisdiction over their concerns. We attend the meetings to get our concerns on SCVTV (God Bless Them) and preserve them for the record. We have long ago rid ourselves of the thought that the council listens to us.
The City of Santa Clarita can and will make recommendations to the County Supervisors office in regard to the landfill. Just as the Castaic Area Town council will make those recommendations. We want them to recommend the landfill expansion be stopped. Why do you think the landfill and it’s PR person have donated money and time at fundraisers for certain Santa Clarita council members? If they had no jurisdiction, why donate? Their voices matter, that’s why.
We’re fighting for our health. You’re fighting for what? It’s not like billboards can affect the long term health of an entire community. It’s really not that big of a concern to be honest. It’s a private real estate deal that will in no way infringe on your health. The very company that owns these boards has agreed to sell out. So why are you fighting? Bigger question: Why are you disparaging our fight? The health and economic impact of 2,000+ people should be a bigger concern. Have you ever heard that quote: First they came… by Martin Niemöller. If we allow a large corporation to put the health of thousands at risk for their own profit, what other corporations will do the same? I can hear it now “Well, you let the landfill expand even though it could hurt people! Why can’t we build this mining project?” Don’t you think CemMex is watching this landfill situation? I do.
Darryl Manzer should be on the City Council! Like them he believes that Santa Clarita residents should be automatons that blindly follow in lock step whatever cliff the council leads them over. He can’t bring himself to name the Councilman (TimBen Boydston) who frequently opposes the other members of the council and calls him a sore loser. The truth is TimBen was elected because people in this city want and need an opposing voice when the Council cuts a bad deal and uses what was voted Open Space for their bad deal. The chief promoter of the bad deal went as far as to say “normal” people don’t attend city council meetings. Sorry Darryl we are not all automatons and in case you hadn’t heard that’s what the democratic process means. You get to disagree and state your opinions for everyone to hear. And what does Measure S have to do with dumping anyway. Concerned citizens can be against both. Making it sound as if people concerned with billboards don’t care about saving lives is disingenuous at best and cheap journalism at its worst. Thousands of people signed a petition against electronic billboards because they are dangerous (other cities have forced their removal) and unsightly. Calling them billboard preservationists is another cheap shot but apparently one that should be expected from Manzer. most of us would like to see them all removed.
Rick Eaton
Canyon Country
Mr. Manzer, Apparently you are a little confused about the law when you state “Now since it was and is a real-estate leasing transaction, it could not be discussed in an open meeting.” State law allows Cities to go into closed session for real estate matters, but does not require them. This according to our City Attorneys Office. As far as the leases that allow this transaction to be discussed, once again you may be confused or misinformed. The leases that the Billboard companies have with Metro are between those two parties and have nothing to do with the City. The leases that allow for closed session discussions are the proposed leases by Metro of City owned land next to the freeways. I would have preferred open government and public discussion of the issue, and competitive bidding.
Thanks Darryl for putting this in prosprective.
Yes, thank you Mr. Manzer for showing the BIG PICTURE for Santa Clarita.