Well, the Castaic Area Town Council held an election Saturday. Estimates show that about 250 people turned out to vote, or around 1 percent of the population of the Castaic area. So the Town Council hardly has a mandate to do anything – especially when it comes to the Chiquita Canyon Landfill.
Now the big concern for residents of Val Verde is that the current Town Council members will attempt to do the following:
1. Change the bylaws so that a simple majority instead of a two-thirds majority can vote to approve a contract (in this case, with Chiquita Canyon Landfill), and vote in favor of the expansion of that dump.
2. Vote to extend terms to 12 years, or three consecutive terms.
3. Vote to accept the contract from Chiquita Canyon Landfill.
This could all happen next Wednesday unless those who are leaving office are convinced that folks don’t want the dump to expand and will recuse themselves since they are lame ducks. Don’t see that happening.
This Town Council election had all of the trappings of the era in New York City when Tammany Hall was in power. There, elections were conducted with the assistance of folks who would convince you to vote a certain way. In Castaic, the graft starts with members of the Lions Club actively campaigning to get folks to vote for people who want the dump to expand. It does make it easy, since the president of the Town Council is also in Lions Club there.
All this time I thought Lions Club was to help folks see better. You know, eyesight concerns. I didn’t know getting out the vote and expressing to folks the persons to elect was anything Lions Club International approved. Seems far away from the stated goals.
But all of that didn’t help the current folks on the Town Council. At least three anti-dump folks were elected. So if the current folks can rush through an agreement with the dump before the newly elected folks take over, they will have done their job.
Understand that the representative of Supervisor Antonovich has given a document to each representative on the Castaic Area Town Council stating that financial disclosure is not required. So we may never know what financial gains that the current Town Council members are getting or not getting from the dump. Since they don’t have to disclose their interests, we can only guess that they are honest – or are they?
Also understand that the lawyer hired by the Castaic Area Town Council has also said the vote to approve the contract with the dump doesn’t need two-thirds approval because it doesn’t apply to this contract. Maybe he is reading a different set of bylaws – but they read very clearly that a two-thirds majority vote is required for all contracts.
There is a bigger question, and that is: Just why do the unincorporated areas of the county even have town councils? The county pays them nothing, so they seek funds to operate for places that may be in direct opposition to what the folks want. Such is the case in the Castaic Area. It really looks like a major conflict of interest.
This is getting more convoluted every day. The dump claims there haven’t been any violations of the current operating permit. There is proof in the form of documents showing that many times over, the dump has been in violation by accepting hazardous materials. In 2011, the state of California won a lawsuit against Chiquita Canyon Landfill for taking in toxic waste in violation of its 1997 agreement with Val Verde and the conditions of approval with the county. But the dump’s spokesman seems blind to such proof.
Folks, go look at this website: http://chiquitalandfill.net/elevated-gases. The methane gas level is scary. Readings are not to exceed 5 percent methane concentration. Levels above 45 percent are common in those reports. Methane is a natural gas, the same stuff you use in your stove or heater. It was at explosive levels.
Last week it was discovered that there were 250 complaints against the landfill this year. If there are no problems, why so many complaints? The dump spokesman says the complaints are not verified. That, my friends, isn’t true.
Chiquita Canyon Landfill thinks that giving money to many, many organizations in the SCV is the right thing to do. I, like Steve Lee of Val Verde, am so glad the dump plans to start doing the right thing.
Steve stated:
The right thing would be to honor the contract with Val Verde and close the dump.
The right thing would be not to buy Castaic Area Town Council so it won’t turn its back on Val Verde.
The right thing is to listen to the people that have to live with the smells. The right thing to do is fix the smells (from the landfill).
The right thing to do is NOT blame a flower, neighbor or septic tank for smells that come from the dump.
The right thing to do is NOT sit for hours outside houses of someone that has complained about the smells.
The right thing to do is to buy the right equipment to stop the smells.
The right thing to do is put in the Draft Environmental Impact Report the 10,000 trucks and cars that are expected into the air quality section of (the environmental impact report).
The right thing to do is to be upfront about the violations and not to hide them from Val Verde. They have all been found with much research.
To the Chiquita Canyon Landfill and its spokesman: I’m glad you stated you are doing the right thing now by your gifts to the community. What Val Verde needs, and indeed what all of the SCV needs, is for you to do your job. The “right thing” is to operate your landfill in accordance with the laws and regulations required by the permit you now hold. If you can’t do that, please feel free to complete operations in accordance with the 1997 agreement and close as required.
I’m sure the SCV would not want your “gifts,” and you wouldn’t need to give them, if you did what was required. Val Verde, Castaic, and the SCV are not for sale. The vote Saturday, while by a small percentage of the Castaic Area, showed one thing: Folks don’t want Castaic Area Town Council members who vote to expand the dump. They don’t want Town Council members who will sell friends’ and neighbors’ health and welfare.
Too bad it wasn’t a large turnout saying the same thing. It did prove one thing: The Castaic Area Town Council isn’t supported by the Castaic area, in that a turnout of only 250 folks does not make a mandate. It does mean the Castaic Area Town Council does not and cannot speak for the people of the Castaic Area.
That concern must be addressed by Supervisor Antonovich before any actions can be taken by the current members of the Castaic Area Town Council. That is a “right thing” to do. I hope he does.
Darryl Manzer grew up in the Pico Canyon oil town of Mentryville in the 1960s and attended Hart High School. After a career in the U.S. Navy he returned to live in the Santa Clarita Valley. He can be reached at dmanzer@scvhistory.com. His older commentaries are archived at DManzer.com; his newer commentaries can be accessed [here]. Watch his walking tour of Mentryville [here].
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
REAL NAMES ONLY: All posters must use their real individual or business name. This applies equally to Twitter account holders who use a nickname.
12 Comments
Mr. Manzer the percentage of people who showed up or were able to even vote is extremely interesting. In today’s world it is amazing that people take the time show and voice their opinions. Thank you for your opinions and opening important discussions. Here’s to a beautiful windy day!
Thank you for continuing to highlight this important issue. I hope more and more residents of the Santa Clarita Valley will educate themselves about what the landfill expansion would truly mean and the potential hazards and will make their voices known. It will take a large number of residents making it clear to Michael Antonovich’s office that we don’t want this expansion to keep it from happening.
Thank you for bringing more light to this entire situation. It is sad that more of the Castaic proper residents had no idea of the vote for the CATC nor are they aware of the landfill expanding in their direction. All those expensive signs for certain candidates did nothing for them. I wonder who exactly paid for those wonderful expensive banners that were placed all over Castaic proper for incumbents that lost on such a small percentage of voters.
I actually sat and watched the voting for CATC reps for about three hours. The process amazed me. Two young people were paid by a CATC member to sit and do the intake of the voters, mark them off the register and hand them their individual ballots for their area. They had no experience in verifying actual residents versus those who claim to live in the area. They only had printed lists of registered voters for the three areas that had more than one candidate. I could have said I was a friend of mine who lives in Castaic and voted. I didn’t see anyone asking for verification or proof of who you are.
There were only three boxes to place your votes. There were four openings on the board. I was turned away and not allowed to vote simply because my rep was running unopposed. I wanted to show my support and vote for me rep no matter what, but they wouldn’t let me. I heard from a few of my neighbors they were denied their voting rights based on the same reason.
There were CATC reps watching the boxes and a hired county employee to watch also. Not sure who paid the county employee.
Granted this was not a vote for the Governor or the President, but it seemed to me to be run a little loose, leaving the opening for various illegal voting activities.
Didn’t hear a word about it. How come?
This coming Wednesday the Castaic Town Council will vote to change their bylaws. The one thing they want to change it the two thirds vote required. They would like it to be a simple majority.
At the last meeting a lawyer informed Val Verde residents why the two thirds did not count when it came to voting for the contract with the landfill. The president also informed Val Verde residents how the two thirds vote had never been used before for any decisions. Even when they voted to buy shirts.
That sent a strong message to me as a resident of Val Verde. Shirts must surely outweigh the quality of life for any resident of Val Verde.
The votes in section 1 and 3 of Castaic sent a different message. The quality of life for residents near the landfill is much more important than shirts. I want to thank Castaic voters for that message.
I would like to also that the Val Verde residents who visited friends in the other regions of Castaic and made them aware of the issues. Val Verde is part of Castaic, and they too have a right to quality of life.
For those who don’t know, I am on the CATC Board as one of the representatives from Val Verde. I was at the CATC bylaws meeting last week and I would like to clarify the following statements:
1. The simple majority will be for contracts which pertain to services or purchases and will still require multiple bids, be fully funded, etc, so the change is from 2/3 to simple majority. The reason being that all members of the board may not be in attendance and it should not hamper the ability of the board to move forward with purchases or services. All other contracts will require 2/3 majority and will be a new section – the board feels this is important and needs to be 2/3 majority.
2. The extension from 2 to 3 consecutive terms is correct, however the first term does not count if that person took over a vacant seat. So theoretically, it could be as high as nearly 16 years. Currently it is 12 years. The reason for this is that it’s sometimes difficult to get someone to run, so if they want to serve that long, they should be allowed to.
3. The vote to accept the agreement with the landfill has already taken place. The results were 6 for and 4 against.
The bylaws were being looked into early this year and the Bylaws Committee has done an exceptional job correcting errors and confusion. There are only a few changes to the bylaws that don’t fit into the category of correction/clarification. I don’t feel that this is being rushed, because the old board is going away. I do feel that the bylaws need to be updated and I’m glad that our Bylaws Committee has done so.
Greg, when you say the vote to accept the agreement has taken place, you meant to add that it was defeated, right? Since a 6-4 vote is not 2/3, but rather 60%, so it failed, right?
45% methane levels are very scary! We know that there are lots of pipes under the trash which are full of methane. I don’t know how they interconnect, but I’m pretty sure they do, therefore if a truck ran over a rock and caused a spark in an environment where 45% methane levels existed and it caused an explosion, we could be looking at explosions in the pipe network and the entire landfill going up. We have residents who are very close to the landfill and an explosion of methane filled pipes sounds pretty dangerous.
– My question is threefold: how did the methane levels get so high, how long was it that high and why did it take so long to detect?
– There probably should be a fifth questions: What has been done to insure the residents that this will never happen again.
By the way, has anyone heard about the landfill producing those test results they promised, regarding the sludge they illegally took in? I’ve asked and they refuse to provide them. The only reason I’m asking is because John Musella made a public statement that the landfill did test the sludge. If there’s nothing to hide, then why not release the results?
Why is this important to us?
– The community asked the county to put a condition on the landfill that they would not accept sludge, which is in the CUP.
– The community asked for this, because sludge is highly concentrated materials. Much of the water is evaporated out of the material and the leftover is sludge.
– We know that any trace materials in the watered down mixture is now concentrated when it becomes sludge.
– We feel that it can’t be good for the community to have loads and loads of sludge dumped in the landfill, right next door
– We know that the sludge the landfill took in was banned from being accepted by Toland Landfill.
– We were told that Toland was not allowed to accept the sludge, because the arsenic levels were too high per Ventura County standards.
– We do not believe the composition of the sludge has changed, or else it would be okayed by Ventura County and dumped at Toland Landfill.
– We believe the landfill has not been forthcoming with us and they are hiding something, regarding the sludge and what’s in it.
– We ask that the sludge be removed from the landfill. It should have never been brought in, therefore it should be removed.
– If not, then show us the test results (all that the landfill has). We want to see the test results from Cater and from Chiquita’s testing.
– These requests should be honored by Chiquita Canyon Landfill. John Musella has been quoted as saying that they’re a good neighbor. So, be a good neighbor and show us what you’ve dumped next door to us or get rid of it.
Then it should be 2/3 of the present members at the time of the vote. It is easy to get friends for a simple majority, harder to pull a 2/3 vote. It is also easier to feel that you know what is best for the people when you become complacent on a board for such a long time. You quit talking to your constituents and assume what they want.
This term limit change is nothing more than a self serving act by the CATC. I am set to join the council in January and I do not feel I need 12 years on the council. If one cannot accomplish what they need to accomplish in 8 years, then that would make them an ineffective leader and they should move on. This is just like congress giving themselves a raise. Greg, I am disappointed you agreed with the change. The bylaws worked for 14 years and now all of a sudden need to be changed because certain council members want to keep their power? Disgusting.
Bonnie, I ask that you look at the bylaws and changes and see what you think of them. After seeing the changes, I think you’ll see that there are only one or two that are anything but clarification. A lot of work went into updating the bylaws and I think Sandia did a great job.