header image

[Sign Up Now] to Receive Our FREE Daily SCVTV-SCVNews Digest by E-Mail

Inside
Weather
Santa Clarita CA
Cloudy
Cloudy
43°F
 
Calendar
Today in
S.C.V. History
January 29
1945 - Local residents vote 1,184 to 7 (correct, seven) to create SCV high school district [story]

students


STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER MIGNON L. CLYBURN ON AT&T/DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG LICENSE TRANSFER PROCEEDING

 

Before discussing the concerns I have about the license transfer applications filed by AT&T Inc. and Deutsche Telekom AG this past March, I will address the procedural posture the Commission finds itself in because, on November 23, after being notified of the Commission’s intent to circulate a Hearing Designation Order, the Applicants sent an electronic filing to request withdrawal of these applications. I understand why the decision was made not to proceed with the Hearing Designation Order and I wish to express my support for today’s release of the staff Analysis and Findings. The agency has the discretion to issue such a report in this proceeding and furthermore, this action promotes federal agency transparency. Several outside parties have spent considerable time and resources to respond to the data and information requests that the FCC staff has asked them to prepare, and they deserve to see the staff’s analysis of the record evidence. In addition, the Applicants have stated that they “are continuing to pursue the sale of Deutsche Telekom’s U.S. wireless assets to AT&T.” Consequently, as they decide how best to reframe any changes to their transfer of control applications, the Applicants also deserve to have the benefit of the staff’s Analysis and Findings.

When I began to consider this license transfer application between the number two and number four (in terms of subscribers) nationwide mobile wireless service providers, I initially had concerns about the impact such a proposed merger would have for competition, innovation and investment, and customer service. I decided to keep an open mind because the Applicants offered interesting arguments why these license transfers would serve the public interest. Most notably, AT&T’s customers have complained about the problems they have with AT&T’s mobile wireless data services and the acquisition of additional spectrum could help alleviate that problem. Second, AT&T asserted that the proposed merger would result in a net gain of job openings for Americans seeking to enter the mobile wireless service industry. As is evident in the Analysis and Findings, the FCC staff engaged in a careful and thorough review of each of these issues.

As I have said before, if we want markets to be unencumbered by the cost of regulation, we need to ensure that the markets are truly competitive. My concern that the proposed merger could substantially lessen competition in the mobile wireless service market begins with what I see in the current state of the market. Increased consolidation, over the past several years, has resulted in fewer regional and rural service providers that are able to discipline the largest carriers. Voice and data roaming and other network sharing agreements would stimulate the deployment of networks to more Americans, but the denial of these agreements and those opportunities would prevent the smaller carriers from providing competitive service offerings to their subscribers, resulting in pockets of this Nation not being robustly served. In fact, the most recent 15th Mobile Services Report finds that more than seven million Americans still live in rural census blocks with two or fewer mobile service providers. In addition, more than 37 million Americans live in rural census blocks that have two or fewer choices when it comes to mobile broadband services. It may be that this current state of affairs calls for the Commission to adopt more regulation to better implement the public interest aims of the Communications Act. But, in my view, ensuring that the competitive structure of the market furthers the goals of the Act is another reason why the Commission must review license transfer applications and make its determination as to whether or not such applications serve the public interest.

Consistent with FCC precedent, the staff reviewed those aspects of the structure of the mobile services market that are relevant to this proceeding. It then determined the relevant product market to be the mobile telephony/broadband services product market. It also appropriately reviewed the impact of the merger on a local market basis and a nationwide basis. The staff’s findings suggest the applications appear to substantially lessen competition in ways that no conditions would appear to remedy. The Commission uses the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, or HHI, to trigger when it must take a closer look at the impact of a proposed merger on a relevant geographic market. It conducts that closer scrutiny when a proposed merger would lead to market concentrations that exceed 2800 on the HHI and the change in the HHI would be 100 or the change in the HHI would be 250 or greater in a market irrespective of the total market concentration. Based on the staff analysis, 419 local markets, formally known as Cellular Market Areas, hit the HHI trigger for closer agency scrutiny.

When it subjects a proposed merger to heightened competitive review, the Commission considers whether the proposed merger would create incentives for the merged entity and other competitors, such that they would likely engage in unilateral or coordinated action that would harm competition. Said another way, we ask whether by removing T-Mobile, AT&T and competitors would be more likely to raise prices. After a detailed analysis of these issues, the staff concluded that the removal of T-Mobile as a competitor would create these incentives for AT&T and other competitors because these two companies compete with each other for customers and respond to each other’s competitive strategies. The staff also considered the Applicants’ argument that the merger would not result in these competitive harms because smaller regional mobile wireless carriers are available to effectively compete. The staff was not persuaded by this argument because these smaller mobile wireless carriers do not have the resources to replace T-Mobile’s competitive strength in the market. These smaller carriers have considerably less spectrum, smaller service footprints, lower Average Revenue Per Unit and, as I implied earlier, have difficulties obtaining roaming agreements. Furthermore, it appears the proposed merger would make it even more difficult for these smaller carriers to compete because the merged entity would make it more difficult for them to acquire the more advanced and popular handsets and acquire the backhaul services. For these and additional reasons, the staff report finds that the proposed merger would substantially lessen competition in the market for mobile telephony/broadband services.

I am concerned about the impact that policies and market structure have on innovation and investment in the mobile wireless services market. Innovation is why we have seen mobile wireless handsets change from being about the size of a brick with limited coverage and offering only voice service, to including the advanced technologies in smart phones, tablets and other portable devices that operate at broadband speeds. As the National Broadband Plan stated, greater deployment and adoption of mobile broadband services will drive innovation throughout our Nation’s economy. With regard to the impact of the proposed merger on innovation in the industry, the staff Analysis and Findings also finds harm because by removing T-Mobile, the proposed merger would remove a disruptive force in the mobile wireless services market. T-Mobile exerts that disruptive force by engaging in both price and technical innovation. For example, the staff Analysis explains that, T-Mobile was the first nationwide provider to offer the following innovative pricing plans: month-to-month postpaid plans; plans that allow customers to pay for new phones over four monthly interest free installments; and soft data cap plans that allow customers to exceed their monthly maximum in data service without incurring expensive overage fees. T-Mobile also acted disruptively by being the first to invest in and deploy HSPA+ technology through its network. That strategy led AT&T to respond by accelerating its deployment of the same technology. T-Mobile was a founding member of the Open Handset Alliance which spurred the deployment of Android devices to the market. It was also the first provider to offer an Android smart phone. According to the staff reports, the Applicants have not shown how the innovation in pricing and technology, which T-Mobile had the resources and market power to introduce to the market, would continue after this proposed merger.

Also of concern is that the staff found that the proposed merger could adversely impact customer service. The staff found that AT&T’s documents show that the cost savings from the proposed merger would result from the elimination of most T-Mobile customer service representatives and the complementary infrastructure. In recent years, T-Mobile has received high ratings for its customer service. So, this causes me to question how current customers would be impacted.

As I implied earlier, I was intrigued by the Applicants’ assertions that the proposed transactions would result in the following merger specific benefits: (1) network efficiencies that would allow them to meet the challenges caused by the explosion of data traffic on their networks; and (2) the creation of more jobs for Americans than would occur without the merger. The Applicants submitted several documents to support the network efficiency claim including economic and engineering models. The staff report reviewed these models and, in some instances, agreed with some of the assertions the Applicants made. The staff’s overall assessment of these models and documents, however, is that they fall far short of being persuasive because “the models provided are abstract, [are] not robust to more reasonable assumptions, [are] not consistent with each other or, in many cases, [with] the Applicants’ internal documents and have no demonstrated predictive value.”

The staff also stated that they were not persuaded by the Applicants’ contention that the proposed merger would result in the creation of more jobs. That is due to the staff’s calculation that, in order to reach the dollar amount of synergies the Applicants assert would result from the merger, this would necessarily mean the elimination of jobs. The staff found that this is consistent with AT&T’s own statements in the record that “jobs serving redundant functions” would be eliminated to reduce costs. Furthermore, staff examined the history of AT&T’s management decisions following recent mergers. The staff found that “in 2002, there were 70,000 employees at AT&T Mobility and its predecessor companies. Since then, AT&T merged with Cingular, Dobson, and Centennial. Today, there are 67,000 employees at AT&T Mobility.” After reviewing this evidence, the staff found that, even if AT&T follows through with its commitment to not terminate any call center jobs in the United States, there is “no dispute that the proposed transaction will result in fewer total direct jobs across the business.”The staff Analysis and Findings concludes that the proposed merger would substantially lessen competition whether reviewed at the local market or national market level, and there are substantial questions whether the claimed public interest benefits would occur.

I would like to thank Renata Hesse, Austin Schlick, Rick Kaplan, Paul De Sa and the staff members from their respective Bureaus and Offices who worked tirelessly to finish the review of these applications before 180 days. I commend them for presenting us with a sound analysis of the relevant issues in the proceeding.

Comment On This Story
COMMENT POLICY: We welcome comments from individuals and businesses. All comments are moderated. Comments are subject to rejection if they are vulgar, combative, or in poor taste.
REAL NAMES ONLY: All posters must use their real individual or business name. This applies equally to Twitter account holders who use a nickname.

1 Comment

  1. Michael Van Tol says:

    Elimination of more jobs… great. I’m looking for a customer service job, but not in a call center. I need to work from home. Anyone know of a good source? I’ve tried craigslist, but no luck. Anyone heard of PajamaJobs.com ? They have a lot of jobs listed but I can’t tell if they’re legit…

Leave a Comment


Latest Additions to SCVNews.com
Three new educational videos greet visitors to the Placerita Nature Center to help them understand what they're seeing along the trails.
Educational Videos Unveiled at Placerita Nature Center
1945 - Local residents vote 1,184 to 7 (correct, seven) to create SCV high school district [story]

students
1850 - Death Valley '49er William Robinson dies in Soledad Canyon from drinking too much cool water [story]
Leaving Death Valley
The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health confirmed 19 new deaths throughout L.A. County, 1,123 new cases countywide and 29 new cases in the Santa Clarita Valley.
Friday COVID Roundup: L.A. County Remains in Low Community Level
Teams from the city of Santa Clarita, Santa Clarita Valley Sheriff's Station, Los Angeles County Fire Department and loanDepot competed on Wednesday, Jan. 25 in the Magic Mountain Sky Tower Challenge.
L.A. County Fire Wins Magic Mountain Sky Tower Challenge
Friends of the Children – Los Angeles presented Los Angeles County Supervisor Kathryn Barger with the "Power of One" award at their inaugural Women's Leadership Breakfast held Friday, Jan. 27 at The California Club. Barger was selected to receive the award for her work and dedication to supporting and safeguarding children in Los Angeles County, especially those within the foster care system.
Barger Tapped by Friends of the Children L.A. for ‘Power of One’ Award
The Santa Clarita Artists Association has announced its new Board of Directors for 2023.
Santa Clarita Artists Association Announces 2023 Board
The North County I-5 Enhancements Project has announced that Santa Clarita Valley residents should prepare for a variety of lane reductions and road closures for the week of Jan. 27-Feb. 3.
Jan. 27-Feb. 3: Portions of The Old Road Closed for I-5 Enhancements Project
Everything old is new again and that’s what’s happening at Hart Park in Newhall. Heritage Junction, where eight historic buildings and a steam engine and caboose are on display to the public, has officially been renamed “Santa Clarita History Center” and a new logo designed and adopted.
Heritage Junction Renamed Santa Clarita History Center
TreePeople in partnership with the Old Town Newhall Farmers Market and the Fernandeno Tataviam Band of Mission Indians will be giving away full size fruit trees including lemon, lime, orange, guava, pomegranate and peach on Saturday, Jan. 28.
Jan. 28: Free Fruit Tree Giveaway at Old Town Newhall Farmers Market
Ready to lose your thirsty turf lawn? The Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency will show you where to start! Learn how to remove your lawn and transform it into a beautiful, sustainable landscape. Join our free virtual landscape and gardening workshop, Strategies for Replacing your Lawn, on Saturday, Feb. 4, at 9 a.m.
Feb. 4: Free Workshop ‘Strategies for Replacing Your Lawn’
The Southern California Veterans Study is seeking the input from Veterans living in Los Angeles, Orange or San Diego counties.
Southern California Veterans Study Seeks SoCal Veteran Input
Two California Institute of the Arts alums, Antoine Hunter aka Purple Fire Crow (Dance 2002) and Kite (Music BFA 2014), were among the 45 United States Artists Fellows announced on Tuesday, Jan. 24 who will receive $50,000 unrestricted cash awards.
CalArts Alums Named 2023 United States Artists Fellows
Anyone who has lived in another city will tell you that the events we put on in Santa Clarita are second to none. As we look ahead to the warm weather and sunshine afforded by the arrival of spring, now is a wonderful time to add some of the marquee city of Santa Clarita events to your 2023 calendar.
Ken Striplin | Fun, Family Events Just Around the Corner
1970 - Gov. Ronald Reagan appoints Adrian Adams as Newhall's first "second" judge [story]
Adrian Adams
NEW ORLEANS – The California State University, Northridge Men's and Women's Cross Country programs earned U.S. Track & Field and Cross Country Coaches Association All-Academic Teams for the 2022 NCAA Division I Cross Country season as announced by the USTFCCCA Thursday.
Matadors Cross Country Programs Named to All-Academic Teams
The Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency Board of Directors will now be meeting in-person for all Committee meetings.
Feb. 2: SCV Water Engineering, Operations Committee Regular Meeting
Friends of Placerita Canyon Natural Area invite the public to share in the grand opening of the new "Know Your Nature Center" on Saturday, Jan. 28, at 2 p.m.
Jan. 28: ‘Know Your Nature Center’ Grand Opening
Join Landmark Opera at Santa Clarita United Methodist Church as it presents Gilbert and Sullivan's famous operetta, "The Pirates of Penzance," Sunday, Feb. 5, at 2 p.m.
Feb. 5: Landmark Opera Presenting ‘Pirates of Penzance’
In Santa Clarita Valley Economic Development Corporation's latest episode, you’ll learn about DrinkPAK, a premier contract manufacturer of premium alcoholic and non-alcohol beverages based in Santa Clarita.
SCVEDC’s Latest Podcast Features DrinkPAK CEO Nate Patena
The College of the Canyons Sports Medicine Program and Valencia High School Medical Science Academy will host the 2023 Sports Medicine Professions Fair on Saturday, Feb. 4, from 10 a.m. - noon, at the college's Valencia campus.
Feb. 4: COC, Valencia High Partner to Host Sports Med Fair
The Santa Clarita Performing Arts Center at College of the Canyons will present "Perondi’s Stunt Dog Experience" on Sunday, May 21. Two shows will be offered at 3 p.m. and 7 p.m.
May 21: Santa Clarita PAC Presents ‘Perondi’s Stunt Dog Experience’
On Jan. 19, the Board of Directors for the Santa Clarita Valley Economic Development Corporation approved long-time board member John Shaffery, managing partner of Poole Shaffery, to step into the role of Board co-chair as successor to Roger Seaver.
John Shaffery Named New SCVEDC Co-Chair
The Santa Clarita Valley Sheriff's Station reminds Santa Clarita Valley residents that the past rain event may have created great riding trails, but riding off highway vehicles unauthorized on private property is considered trespassing.
Unauthorized Off Highway Vehicle Owners Reminded to Remain Off Private Property
SCVNews.com
%d bloggers like this: